Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why I believe the pick will be AR-15

philw5289

By philw5289,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, Panthero said:

Maybe. I'm always one of those guys that recognizes that QBs go high. I wouldn't be at all shocked if the qbs go 1,2,3 and then levis goes top 10. It's just the way the game is now. That said, I think ar is a three year project. He may be the best of them all in the end but he needs lots of work. 

I watched about 6 of his games and see a guy who doesn't process well but is athletically a supreme talent. The other two though have him whipped on accuracy and decision making......for now at least. Those skills typically are harder to learn but I thought the same about the Buffalo qb. 

What makes you think he doesn't process well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthero Mentor

Panthero

Posted
Posted
On 4/9/2023 at 11:30 AM, OldhamA said:

What makes you think he doesn't process well?

Based on his decisions during games, holding the ball too long or taking off too quickly. Again this is in comparison to the other two top qbs. I think he's a superior prospect to Levis, but only worthy of a top 10 pick, but not number 1. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted (edited)
53 minutes ago, Panthero said:

Based on his decisions during games, holding the ball too long or taking off too quickly. Again this is in comparison to the other two top qbs. I think he's a superior prospect to Levis, but only worthy of a top 10 pick, but not number 1. 

ummmmm.......

One of my favorite things about Anthony Richardson is how he doesn’t take sacks and moves well in the pocket. His 9.2% pressure to sack rate (PFF) is elite level of sack avoidance. As we can see in the graph below, pressure to sack rate stays pretty stable from college to the pros so it is fair to assume Richardson will have great sack avoidance in the NFL too. 

https://mfootballanalytics.com/2023/02/27/anthony-richardson-review/

 

He is pretty elite navigating the pocket and understanding the rush and when a pocket collapses.  Not sure where you are getting he holds the bold too long

Edited by mrcompletely11
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, frankw said:

What a story it would be if after all is said and done his name is announced as the pick. Man some feelings would be hurt 😂

It wouldnt have hurt my feelings to have kept moore and simply gone to 3 for AR.  If he ends up at 1 I still will be pumped as his skillset would be fun as hell to watch

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthero Mentor

Panthero

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

ummmmm.......

One of my favorite things about Anthony Richardson is how he doesn’t take sacks and moves well in the pocket. His 9.2% pressure to sack rate (PFF) is elite level of sack avoidance. As we can see in the graph below, pressure to sack rate stays pretty stable from college to the pros so it is fair to assume Richardson will have great sack avoidance in the NFL too. 

https://mfootballanalytics.com/2023/02/27/anthony-richardson-review/

 

He is pretty elite navigating the pocket and understanding the rush and when a pocket collapses.  Not sure where you are getting he holds the bold too long

Watching the games, but I'm not an expert so not a hill I'm gonna defend that strongly. JMO.

 

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/news/anthony-richardson-nfl-draft-2023-scouting-report-prospect-profile-nfl-combine-results-pro-comparison-more/

 

Edited by Panthero
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Strength of Schedule for 2025

      By MHS831 · Posted

      We won 5 with the worst defense in the history of defenses.  I think free agency and our draft puts us over 6.5.
    • tukafan21
      T-Mac Jerseys?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Leaning towards just ordering this tonight, but now I have no idea on size. Has anyone bought a bunch of jerseys in the last few years and can convey how the Game vs Limited vs Reebok versions all fit? These are both Mediums... The white one here is a Reebok one from 2010, and was when they had the "+2 length" on the tag and it was the version with the stitched numbers instead of iron on... the blue one is from 2022 and is the F.U.S.E Limited version also with stitched stuff, not the "game jersey" with the ironed on numbers/letters that they have the T-Mac jerseys in. The old one fits me fine, the blue one was always a tad snug on me, particularly in the shoulders I'm leaning going with a Large based on the CMC, but for all I know, that is made with a tighter cut due to the higher "limited" level and the "game" ones they have for T-Mac are cut more like a T-Shirt and thus will fit more like the old white one I have here, not sure. (and yes, I already tried going to a sporting goods store here to hopefully try on a Lions jersey to see, but they don't have any right now)
    • Navy_football
      Strength of Schedule for 2025

      By Navy_football · Posted

      I think there's a ton of potential in that WR room. But they really are unproven right now. Hopefully they live up to the hype.
×
×
  • Create New...