Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hypothetical scenario (that's still possible)


Lurk21
 Share

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

And there have been many more busts so what exactly is your point? The GM said he wanted a young proven player. It was between Burns, Brown, and Moore.

My point was to laugh at the idea that it would be slim odds to find a WR better than DJ in the draft.

I'm glad we fleeced Da Bears... again!

(6:09)

Happy Greg Olsen GIF by Carolina Panthers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, TheMostInterestingMan said:

Okay. But if we think Young is the best player in this draft then we are taking him. If we don’t then we are taking Stroud (or I guess possibly AR). Regardless, we wouldn’t trade away who we feel has the best shot at being a franchise QB for an extra 1st round pick. And if they know we are trading because we believe that they’ll take BY then they know we aren’t taking BY anyway. It just literally doesn’t make any sense lol

I would do it for just 33

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, t96 said:

I could theoretically see us maybe slightly preferring Young but liking Stroud pretty much the same, taking Young 1st and then Houston panics as they thought we’d take Stroud and while they’re on the clock at #2, trade us that pick and quite a bit more for Young, then we still get Stroud who we like as much as Young but pick up some valuable draft ammo too, whether a 2nd rounder, #12 or 2024 1st I don’t know. Still think it’s not gonna happen and we just take our guy at 1.

Not at all

If we traded back to #2 before the draft, we could tell whoever we take that we knew for 100% who the Texans were taking and it wasn’t who we wanted, so we did it for the extra picks.

Once you make the pick, to make the trade then, it tells who you took that they were your second option.

Not how you want to start that relationship

Edited by tukafan21
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Canales IMO was screwed the moment they allowed the Bryce Young "comeback" last season.  Which to me was Morgan and the front office screwing him by not immediately trading him after they "moved on".  if you are Canales how do you get rid of Bryce?  Because if you coach the Panthers to a win last night in spite of Bryce....which a decent coach likely could of or should of.....you are going to end up w/ Bryce Young again next year doing so.  so to an extent, Canales has to treat him like he is supposed to.  It's a double edge sword and lose lose scenario for Dave. 
    • I don't think Canales is on the hot seat at all. We've seen substantial improvement in his time here.  That said, the issues on offense are either Bryce or Canales, or both, and at some point, Tepp is going to have to pick a scape goat. 
    • I really don’t know how people expect Canales to succeed with the fifth grader he has starting behind center every week. I hope he gets a chance with a really quarterback next year. It will be a much more fair assessment. 
×
×
  • Create New...