Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Riddle me this?

Gerry Green

By Gerry Green,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted (edited)
51 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

rippa wants us to wildcat to Jim Brown every play. 

Anthony Richardson is a QB don't let the physique fool you. 

I know the pickings have been slim lately of prototypical 6'4"+QBs and you've been  settling for smaller and smaller but until Drake Maye comes out, Anthony Richardson is the next best thing.

Everything a number one should be, checks every box, intelligence, highS2, elite size, elite QB height, elite arm, elite speed, weak program (Gators) and the next guy up at WR almost every game last season and very little playing time. These will be the best coaches he's ever had in his short history.

You chuckleheads are like "ripp likes Richardson now" derp derp. I didn't really SEE that he was much more like The Legend than the Carolina Panthers should ignore until I compared him to Young. AR or suffer the wrath!

Lightning Storm GIF

Edited by rippadonn
Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Varking said:

Not in the slightest? That’s where his LSU , UGA and Texas tape come into play. 

No, he generally doesn't have those types of problems. Do you see any problems with Young throwing from the pocket, or into tight windows listed on any credible scouting report (if any at all)? And, for all the talk of those games that you mentioned, it's not like they were examples of why NOT to draft Young. If anything, they showed his versatility, escape-ability and ability to get the ball to receivers even though the pocket broke down. Hell, those sacks or near-sacks were jailbreaks due to the breakdown of the O-line. Moreover, the Bama receivers left a few balls on the turf. Anyone who actually watches his play during those games would know without a doubt that he actually can and does throw from the pocket, even under pressure, and he can throw into tight windows like the best of them when it's necessary. Was Young perfect? No. He threw a couple of questionable throws while pressured, and he sailed three or four over the receivers'heads, but I have yet to see the perfect QB, especially when being pressured. And, at the end of the day, these were arguably good games to actually observe Young's extraordinary skill set 

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mother Grabber Grand Master

Mother Grabber

Posted
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Go big or go home.

why? i thought the goal was to score more points, not have the biggest average player size. i’d much rather have a little guy who can hit receivers than a big guy who can’t.

all of your arguments are based on being a big tough guy, and not about actually playing football.

Edited by Mother Grabber
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
Just now, Mother Grabber said:

why? i thought the goal was to score more points, not have the biggest average player size. i’d much rather have a little guy who can hit receivers than a big guy who can’t.

mall of your arguments are based on being a big tough guy, and not about actually playing football.

No. For what you're talking about CJ would be better IMO.

Now if we're taking a chance, swinging for the fences AR. Not the mouse who's ceiling is a doll house.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, Gerry Green said:

If Bryce Young is this super computer on legs. What with his processing power, and ability to read Defenses. Then why is it that CJ can get the ball out on time, and on target in around 2.5 second. Whereas Bryce has to run around like a chicken with its head cut off to make a play?

 

If Bryce is so good at reading and processing? Why can't he get the ball out on target, and on time?

 

Give me the guy who can get the ball out while still standing. Over the guy who has to run around to find a lane.

 

Maybe that's why Bryce's numbers against pressure look so good. Because he leaves the pocket and runs around. KInda skews those numbers just a bit don'tcha think?

 

Look, Bryce may be exciting to watch. But let's not kid ourselves here. By the time that second contract is coming up. Stroud will still be getting the ball out in 2.5 seconds. Whereas Bryce just may be on crutches. Or worse. 

 

 

 

 

Tell me you haven't scouted Young, without saying that you haven't scouted young. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NCBlu
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By NCBlu · Posted

      Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • Soul Rebel
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Soul Rebel · Posted

      I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • rebelrouser
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...