Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

SEC Network: Levis vs Richardson on now


therealmjl
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Varking said:

Folks need to chill with the Cam comparisons because he’s going to be used differently in the pros. He’s not going to be treated like a battering ram. 

That's the problem - he can't throw the ball with any sort of consistency so he is going to have to rely on his legs and a designed running attack to have any sort of consistent success or impact in the NFL. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

For those of you who clearly never watched AR play football in an actual game but still insist he's the second coming of Cam Newton (looking at you @rippadonn) - SEC Network is airing his master class against Kentucky last season.

 

hint: it's terrible

You and TD can be mad all you want. They are enamored with AR.

It is what it is and I get it.

YOU don't.

Lol. The media said we HAVE TO pick my Brycie! 

Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

For those of you who clearly never watched AR play football in an actual game but still insist he's the second coming of Cam Newton (looking at you @rippadonn) - SEC Network is airing his master class against Kentucky last season.

 

hint: it's terrible

He won’t stop thinking we are getting anyone but Bryce until his name is called on Thursday for us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

That's the problem - he can't throw the ball with any sort of consistency so he is going to have to rely on his legs and a designed running attack to have any sort of consistent success or impact in the NFL. 

I believe he’s going to surprise folks in the NFL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Cam had an offensive line, Marvin Harrison, and Steve Smith in their prime, and Olsen / Shockey Cam would've thrown 45 TD every year with 4,500 pass yards

You could give that to Richardson, Mac Jones, and many other QB's and they would still suck

Cam didn't run because he couldn't pass, he ran because he literally couldn't pass .. no protection or separation from WR's

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, FieldsOverTheField said:

If Cam had an offensive line, Marvin Harrison, and Steve Smith in their prime, and Olsen / Shockey Cam would've thrown 45 TD every year with 4,500 pass yards

You could give that to Richardson, Mac Jones, and many other QB's and they would still suck

Cam didn't run because he couldn't pass, he ran because he literally couldn't pass .. no protection or separation from WR's

This is a ridiculous take. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, therealmjl said:

That's the problem - he can't throw the ball with any sort of consistency so he is going to have to rely on his legs and a designed running attack to have any sort of consistent success or impact in the NFL. 

To me he’s Cam without the killer instinct. Cam just had that eye for the big play to mask his below average accuracy. AR looks the part but he’ll need to learn how to stand in the pocket and pass at a decent level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No it's not, there isn't a single coach who's only job is to win games, because no coach is going to win games unless they're also improving the quality of play out of their players. For coaches with contending teams, winning is their #1 job, but I think it's a more than reasonable take to say that coaches of not yet contending teams winning comes second to making your players better. We have 11 games left, if you gave me the option of winning all 11 of the games in terribly ugly fashion to where we don't improve the quality of our players vs we lose all 11 games, but do so in spectacular fashion where our players show significant improvement, I'm taking option B every time. Because option B is the path to future and long term success, while option A is a path to short term happiness at the expense of long term franchise stability.   And yes, that is clearly an extreme example that could never actually play out in either way, but you still know what I mean.  And no, it has nothing to do with draft position, it's about how good will these players be a year, 2 years, 3 years, etc, down the line, when you hope to be a true contending team, because nobody actually thinks we're that type of team this year unless you're literally crazy
    • Yeah if that's what we're signing up for here, then I just can't get behind it.  That contract extension that Hurney gave Jake that offseason was BRUTAL.
    • That's quite literally his only job. Every year has new goals, new identities, etc. But the one constant is to win at all costs. He isn't guaranteed to be here next year UNLESS he wins. Why would he give a poo to mold a bunch of players someone else might be coaching? 
×
×
  • Create New...