Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Round 2 - The Carolina Panthers Select Jonathan Mingo - WR - Mississippi


rodeo
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

Trading up isn’t free lol. What they gave up to take a DE was stupid (and I think CJ will be a bust but that’s subjective) 

Both of those takes are bad. They’ve got so much draft capital why not trade up for the best defensive player in the draft. Better to have one stud than three jags. 

Edited by JawnyBlaze
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Both of those takes are bad. They’ve got so much draft capital why not trade up for the best defensive player in the draft. Better to have one stud than three jags. 

In what world is the #12 pick (higher than Burns was drafted just saying) and a probable top 5 pick in 2024 jags? Now THATS a bad take 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Only to use one of them on a pass rusher.

 

So basically it's Burns for a 1st.

 

Good thing some of you dudes don't make these decisions. Premium pass rushers are the next most important position in football after the QB. You just don't get rid of elite pass rushers.

Did you just state the most obvious thing ever back at me and then go on a victory rant? Yes, of course we would’ve used one on a DE. That isn’t a breakthrough you just made man

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CamWhoaaCam said:

So why trade Burns if we have to replace him at that same position with a player that most likely wont be as good as him?

 

That just doesn't make sense. Trading Burns only makes sense if we already have another DE who can replace his production on the roster.

 

It defeats the purpose of trading him. Understand now?

You can keep saying the same thing over and over again as much as you want. Yes you would need to replace Burns with a rookie DE or go buy one in FA. Yes you would have an extra first round pick (or 2 if you go FA). These are not new revelations. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, KillerKat said:

Shi Smith and Damiere Byrd will be battling it out for a spot now.

Yeah, you got to think we carry 6 WRs max. I’m no particular order:

Thielen, Chark, Marshall, Shenault, Mingo, Byrd, Smith, Wright, Williams, Saunders.

The last 3 are probably gone but then you gotta decide between Bryd and Smith. 
 

Unless there is a plan to make Laviska a RB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Damn I hadn't watched many highlights but Mingo has some wheels for 6'2" 220lbs. Hopefully he's AJ Brown/Deebo. I guess the foot injury hurt his stock. Seems very confident in his car interview thing

Yea he can move and is is going to be a yac machine. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

Yea he can move and is is going to be a yac machine. 

Yeah looks like we're going quick strike yac offense with Chark over the top. Mingo can get out there too though, I forgot he was basically Corrals only weapon his last year at Ole Miss

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...