Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Preseason Tier Ranking of QBs in AFC / NFC


 Share

Recommended Posts

one of the faces from tier 6 in the NFC will bump up to fill that void in tier 1 by the end of the season.

the other one on tier 6 plays for the bears.

there's a few between tier 4 and 5 in the NFC that i would switch around.

AFC peeps have  their work cut out for them. don't have any issues with those rankings. 

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, WS Pantherfan said:

Where is Cam Newton at? There are not 32 QBs better than him. /jk

Looks like a solid tier list to me. Deshaun Watson and Russell Wilson may be a little low. Should probably be at the top of tier 5. 

yeah.. this past season really hurt their stock for me but you are probably right..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This looks like it was put together without actual thought. Hurts and Allen are very good Qb’s but do you actually think they’re on the same level as Joe Burrow? They think Matt Stafford is on the same level as Lamar Jackson or Aaron Rodgers? Which btw I’d probably still list ARod as a tier 1 Qb or at least tier 2 with Burrow. 
 

after this season Bryce will be the top Qb in the NFC. Just had to throw that in there lol

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, LordOfDaWingz said:

This looks like it was put together without actual thought. Hurts and Allen are very good Qb’s but do you actually think they’re on the same level as Joe Burrow? They think Matt Stafford is on the same level as Lamar Jackson or Aaron Rodgers? Which btw I’d probably still list ARod as a tier 1 Qb or at least tier 2 with Burrow. 
 

after this season Bryce will be the top Qb in the NFC. Just had to throw that in there lol

Hurts and Allen are on par with Burrow.. all of them are great but a step below Mahomes..

Stafford has a recent ring and Lamar hasn't even been in an AFC Championship.. Rogers hasn't been good in 2 years but is still not doubt a good QB..

Glad you have your opinion.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, bLACKpANTHER said:

Hurts and Allen are on par with Burrow.. all of them are great but a step below Mahomes..

Stafford has a recent ring and Lamar hasn't even been in an AFC Championship.. Rogers hasn't been good in 2 years but is still not doubt a good QB..

Glad you have your opinion.. 

ARod hasn’t been good in 2 years? That’s being hella dramatic 


2021: 4115 pass yards, 37 touchdowns, 4 interceptions, 111.9 rating 

2022: 3695 pass yards, 26 touchdowns, 12 interceptions, 91.1 rating 

 

I’ll give you Stafford bc he could bounce back this season. 

 

I don’t necessarily think Hurts or Allen are on par with Burrow and that might be my LSU fan bias but also counting in post season success and Burrow having played in back to back AFC Championship games and his ability to protect the ball as compared to Allen. And Burrow is 3-1 vs Mahomes. 
 

I’ll wait and see on Hurts bc he’s legit only had 1 high caliber season and I don’t think a season alone should qualify someone in the top tiers. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Luciu5 said:

I wouldn't have used Darnold for SF personally. I don't think that's really fair. Trey Lance is supposed to be good to go by training camp I believe. I highly doubt Darnold will beat him out.

Idk, are they still trying to trade Lance? Doesn’t seem like they are high on him anymore. Hopefully Trey can go to a better situation for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dang, we might not be able to create the same magic from last year!
    • If we were a solid winning organization most of us would have no problems with this selection. We would have had a capable starter in place to allow him to be eased into the rotation. If were told prior to the draft that he had been completely cleared health wise, we "probably" wouldn't have a ton of reservations about this selection. If we had picked this young man on Day 3 of the draft most of us would have no problems with this selection because we wouldn't have had to use draft capital to move up and get him. Unfortunately, none of the above were true 1)  We were a terrible team in 2023 and needed an immediate impact player. 2)  He was hurt near the the end of the 2023 NCAA season. We traded up to get him even though we knew he wasn't medically cleared to play in 2024. 3) When training camp started we were hearing stories that the knee wasn't ready. That alone should have raised some red flags. I personally would have red-shirted him in 2024 in order to have him ready for 2025. We had Chubba as our lead back and other guys to fill the #2 and #3 spots on the depth chart. There was no need to rush Brooks unto the field in 2024. Here's our draft history in the 2nd round between 2021 and 2024 2021 TMJ 2022 No draft choice. We picked Matt Corall in round 3 (#94) as our only Day 2 pick. 2023 Jonathan Mingo 2024 Jonathon Brooks. We have taken 4 skill players on Day 2 of the draft for the past 4 years who have contributed absolutely nothing to the offensive side of the football. 3 are no longer on the team. Two of them are no longer in the NFL. One  could possibly never start a game due to a knee injury. This type of poor drafting is why this team has been so bad for the entire decade. 
    • Even limited as he was I still don't think they have replaced his production, and not just the sack stats. The games Clowney missed it was very obvious what his value still was. Risky move but whatever. They only had 32 sacks last year and if that drops then it's going to get ugly. I see the improvement in run stopping but not in pass protect in any way.  
×
×
  • Create New...