Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jordan Pond


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

I decided to use better images, but you get the point . Funny how fans pick up on things. Young is more baby-faced of course. spacer.png

 spacer.png

Images from SoundCloud & DawgNation, respectively.

"They even drew some similarities between him and Warriors star Jordan Poole. One fan labeled Young as "Jordan Pond", indicating him as the smaller version of Poole. "

Fans are funny as hell. 

 

https://www.sportskeeda.com/nfl/news-nfl-fans-troll-bryce-young-smaller-version-jordan-poole-panthers-qb-gets-spotted-lakers-vs-warriors-game?key1=sportspydernfl&utm_source=sportspyder&utm_medium=nfl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

How come when I make a bunch of Bryce is short jokes folks get upset with me? But some rando fan does it, and it's perfectly acceptable. I think I'm smelling a double standard here folks. lol

Gerry, you don’t play the victim very well, do you?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Panthera onca said:

Gerry, you don’t play the victim very well, do you?

 

Don't give a crap about playing the victim. I just enjoy life. Not my fault there is an abundance of fuddy duddies up in here.

 

And for the record. Some of my Bryce is short jokes were Gold. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Panthera onca said:

Seems like an odd thing to get your panties in a wad about.

 

You appear to be the one not letting go. It's okay, the sun will come out tomorrow. Or the next day. Or sometime in the near future.

 

I absolutely love this place. Some of you have no idea how much you enrich my life. It's truly better than tv. Most of the time anywho.

 

It's obvious that some Huddlers take this far too cereal. It's entertainment folks. Enjoy it for what it is. A respite from all the craziness out there in the real world I tell ya what.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

Wouldn’t a pond typically be larger than a pool?

 

I think as a general rule you may be correct. However, there are some small ponds, and there are some large pools. So, although you may be correct in the literal sense, you are probably not 100% correct in reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

How come when I make a bunch of Bryce is short jokes folks get upset with me? But some rando fan does it, and it's perfectly acceptable. I think I'm smelling a double standard here folks. lol

Well, I think it's about the intent behind the joke. As well, at least in my mind, I think that the story is more about the resemblance between the two than a mildly amusing (and perhaps perverse) joke. 

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Well, I think it's about the intent behind the joke. As well, at least in my mind, I think that the story is more about the resemblance between the two than a mildly amusing (and perhaps perverse) joke. 

 

Here's a quote; "They even drew some similarities between him and Warriors star Jordan Poole. One fan labeled Young as "Jordan Pond", indicating him as the smaller version of Poole. "

 

Just an innocent short joke. Nothing to see here.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

Here's a quote; "They even drew some similarities between him and Warriors star Jordan Poole. One fan labeled Young as "Jordan Pond", indicating him as the smaller version of Poole. "

 

Just an innocent short joke. Nothing to see here.

Who is gonna tell that fan that’s pools are smaller than ponds
 

how’s that’s for PEDANTIC?!?

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...