Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rumor - Canes Adding Tarasenko

MillionDollarCam
 Share

Recommended Posts

MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 hours ago, carpanfan96 said:

What if they traded Drury and Pesce for EK. I've heard that SJ is willing to go over 20% now on retention. (Been the hold up on ek deals) 35% or so now, add a second team at 20% and give up some picks and prospects.  Canes have had this Tank deal on the table since day 1.

That could work if they get the retention to 55%, that’s probably where it needs to be. And then we send out Pesce and Drury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anybodyhome Grand Master

Anybodyhome

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, MillionDollarCam said:

 

Bunting - Aho - Tarasenko

Svechnikov - Kotkaniemi - Necas

Teravainen - Staal - Fast

Noesen - Martinook - Jarvis

Drury

Until #37 comes back, I see Turbo with Aho, keeping a familiar face on his line.

Bunting is on the 2nd line until Svech is back.

Noesen moves back to the checking line and Drury fills the 4th line.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

Until #37 comes back, I see Turbo with Aho, keeping a familiar face on his line.

Bunting is on the 2nd line until Svech is back.

Noesen moves back to the checking line and Drury fills the 4th line.

Agree on everyone/thing but Noesen. I think he’s QB for 4. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Anybodyhome said:

Until #37 comes back, I see Turbo with Aho, keeping a familiar face on his line.

Bunting is on the 2nd line until Svech is back.

Noesen moves back to the checking line and Drury fills the 4th line.

I get confused with the 4th line. Ive always known it to be for upcomers and older vets, but for us we put someone like Jarvis there who is a top 6. Wouldnt putting a top6 guy on the 4th usually mean a disgruntled player?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anybodyhome Grand Master

Anybodyhome

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

I get confused with the 4th line. Ive always known it to be for upcomers and older vets, but for us we put someone like Jarvis there who is a top 6. Wouldnt putting a top6 guy on the 4th usually mean a disgruntled player?

You're right in that moving Jarvy to the 4 is kind of a gut punch. But, there's not much room to slot him in anywhere unless Turbo gets moved. Even then, someone might have to play on their off-side.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • SmokinwithWilly
      Panthers Sign QB Will Grier

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      The pattern of what we've done before, during and after the trade and selection of Bryce points to Tepper being involved in his selection and continued presence as the unquestioned starter. Pickett sucked in Philly, he just didn't start. If he hadn't sucked, Pittsburg wouldn't have gotten rid of him as a 1st round QB. Grier is so bad we already cut him once. He offers zero upside. There were FA QBs available last season that we could have gotten over Dalton who actually outperformed Bryce. The bar is low, ridiculously low. But we keep adding people who have proven they are below that bar.  Bryce is a bottom tier QB. We should be actively looking to improve the roster. You can say virtually no QB3s and few QB2s could challenge Bryce. That's true. But it also means there may be some that can. We're not looking for those guys. We should be. They could definitely challenge a KP or Grier.  The goal is winning seasons and winning the division. Relying on the Falcons to win so you can get into the playoffs with a losing record in a weak division isn't a recipe for success.   
    • strato
      Draft Week Rumors, Leaks and Media Draftniks Final Mocks

      By strato · Posted

      Man oh man talk about getting it wrong coming And going. Have two viable arms and don’t stay the course so you draft a noodle arm that stands on his tippy toes to see, they make us go the full 5 years waiting for him to pan out.    
    • 45catfan
      Draft Week Rumors, Leaks and Media Draftniks Final Mocks

      By 45catfan · Posted

      I guess it's so we don't have to force a UDFA QB to be in serious consideration for QB3.  QB4 will be just a camp arm and maybe a stash on the PS if he looks half way decent. They will not bring in competition for Bryce if you haven't figured that out by now.  He's either going to sink or swim.  The next QB with a legit arm on this team will be when we move on from Bryce.  I think this is the ramifications from the Darnold/Mayfield debacle. 
×
×
  • Create New...