Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If the Cardinals can have back to back winning seasons


pstall

Recommended Posts

meh....they haven't done it since the mid 80's and then it seems they only pull it off once every decade.

it's teams like that that give me hope. you know....maybe after we have been around 40 years or so we can finally have back to back winning seasons...maybe even get a ring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kurt Warner, larry fitzgerald, anquan boldin, steve breaston. enough said. not to mention antrell rolle, Andrian Wilson, Darnell Dockett, and Karlos Dansby.

who is their personnel Director??

I think we have as talented a roster as any team in the league.

Case in point: overall, we have a better roster than this year's Patriots. Does that mean we're going to win this Sunday?

Of course not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Cards werent content with bringing with 21 of 22 starters back..They made changes.despite going to the super bowl.

What did we do...we gave out huge extensions.

The Cardinals saw more changes in their coaching staff than they did players.

Most of their offseason consisted of resigning key players, most notably Warner and Boldin, but several other players resigned.

I don't think they made as many personnel changes as you think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of the changes they made were to their coaching staff, some by design and others by default. It isn't like we didn't overhaul our defensive staff as well. As for a quarterback, they brought back a guy with a history of injury and inconsistency over the last 5 years who is 4 years older than Jake. They haven't been exactly dynamic in their changes and so far have been lucky in the injury department. i didn't see anyone of their starters on IR on NFL.com.

As for comparisons, I certainly wouldn't look to the cardinals as a model for our team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Cardinals saw more changes in their coaching staff than they did players.

Most of their offseason consisted of resigning key players, most notably Warner and Boldin, but several other players resigned.

I don't think they made as many personnel changes as you think.

what are you talking about..lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Cards werent content with bringing with 21 of 22 starters back..They made changes.despite going to the super bowl.

What did we do...we gave out huge extensions.

what are you talking about..lol

Did I stutter?

;)

Seriously though, they didn't do a whole lot in the offseason personnelwise compared with the Panthers. Both teams saw more changes with coaches than players, and there were more resignings than there were new acquisitions.

If you think otherwise, tell me why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did I stutter?

;)

Seriously though, they didn't do a whole lot in the offseason personnelwise compared with the Panthers. Both teams saw more changes with coaches than players, and there were more resignings than there were new acquisitions.

If you think otherwise, tell me why.

I agree with you.I was just saying the panthers sat on bringing 21 of 22 starters back all season.the cards at least did somthing on purpose

But when did Boldin resign?I think he still wants out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...