Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Status of Rhule era draft picks


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, RumHam said:

i refelt something towards the end of last year. Felt like the late 2004 run. So we at 2005 now gonna make the nfc championship. 

What I saw was a reminder of how far this team has fallen, again.  This team needed a staff and roster purge. The only question was when and how far was Tepper willing to go. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rayzor said:

I tried to be. Lasted a couple weeks.

I forced enthusiasm and I think a lot did. We were desperate for something good.

I haven't had to force any enthusiasm this year.

Pretty similar to me. I was never a big fan of hiring a college coach but I did what I could to be positive.

My first real "uh oh" moment was when Tepper and Marty were telling the story about his interview. Couldn't help but think it sounded like a couple of senior citizens describing how smart the young man who sold them their new insurance policy sounded. When the info about him having total control hit, that was another "grin and stay positive" moment, but the unease was still there.

Of course, the start of season two made it look like it was actually going to work though. Everybody was excited, until we hit mid-season and realized it all just been an illusion.

The Rhule era (If a three year period can be called that) was a heck of a rollercoaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

This was a question someone asked in the cut thread. Thought I'd go ahead and post the table here.

2020

1 (7) DT Derrick Brown
2 (38) DE Yetur Gross-Matos
2 (64) S/LB Jeremy Chinn

----------

4 (113) CB Troy Pride Jr
5 (152) S Kenny Robinson
6 (184) DT Bravvion Roy
7 (221) CB Stantley Thomas-Oliver III *

2021

1 (8) CB Jaycee Horn
2 (59) WR Terrace Marshall Jr
3 (70) T Brady Christensen
3 (83) TE Tommy Tremble
4 (126) RB Chuba Hubbard

----------

5 (158) DT Daviyon Nixon
5 (166) CB Keith Taylor
6 (193) G Deonte Brown *
6 (204) WR Shi Smith *
6 (222) LS Thomas Fletcher    
7 (232) DT Phil Hoskins

2022

1 (6) T Ickey Ekwonu
3 (94) QB Matt Corral
6 (189) DE Amaré Barno
6 (199) OL Cade Mays    

----------

4 (120) LB Brandon Smith *    
7 (242) CB Kalon Barnes

...

Still fluid of course, but that's where we stand at the moment. The guys with asterisks could potentially be brought back to the practice squad.

Comparing notes...

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, thunderraiden said:

Sounds like an upgrade over hurney considering we're still hitting on Round 1 and making some good picks sometimes on round 2 and 3 unlike Hurney which was no picks outside of round 1 ever lol

I think people forget Hurney was good at trades and finding players that didn't pan out with one team but come here and flourish. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ncguy2184 said:

I think people forget Hurney was good at trades and finding players that didn't pan out with one team but come here and flourish. 

 

I mean pre lockout talk Hurney was a pretty good GM.   Then lockout window hit and I think Jerry was a big part in us going sideways, dumb contracts, etc.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ncguy2184 said:

I think people forget Hurney was good at trades and finding players that didn't pan out with one team but come here and flourish. 

Marty sometimes found a good players. He also all too frequently found mediocre to bad ones.

Ultimately, if you want to accurately judge a GM, you pretty much have to look at the whole roster.

Marty just didn't build winning teams, even when he had cornerstone guys like Newton and Kuechly to build around.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ThPantherFan said:

At the least.  Lot of ?s.

If they get lucky in the draft, and find better depth in the next offseason, and most of all stay healthy, I could see them making some noise in the playoffs.  But thats a lot of it's that have to go their way.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Person's post cutdown thoughts...

Rough day for Matt Rhule guys

Rhule had a big say in personnel during his three seasons in Carolina. But Reich and the new staff said goodbye to five of the draft picks from Rhule’s tenure. All were third-day picks: receiver Shi Smith, cornerbacks Keith Taylor and Stantley Thomas-Oliver, linebacker Brandon Smith and offensive lineman Deonte Brown, who was waived at roster cutdowns for the second year in a row.

Brandon Smith was the highest draft pick among Tuesday’s casualties. The Panthers took Smith in the fourth round from Rhule’s Penn State alma mater despite very little college production. Smith, Taylor and Brown were part of an 11-player class in 2021. Six of the seven players chosen on the third day that year are gone, with running back Chuba Hubbard (fourth round) the lone man standing.

Thomas-Oliver’s exit means only three players remain from the all-defensive draft class brought in by Rhule and Marty Hurney in 2020 shortly after Rhule was hired: first-round pick Derrick Brown and second-rounders Yetur Gross-Matos and Chinn.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s a little sunny to say all the bad picks were Matt rhule or Matt rhule’s philosophy

fitterer has talked pretty glowingly about his affinity for drafting guys who are high traits and allowing the coaches to develop them, and the most recent draft had more than one guy who fit the mold of big athletic profile who wasn’t a major collegiate producer 

its not really that scandalous to wiff on most of your day 3 picks anyways and if you’re going to be taking a chance you’d rather do it on guys with big athletic profiles

Ideally a more veteran nfl staff can draw out these athletic traits, but they’re definitely not going to stop keying in on athleticism as an extremely important scouting metric

Edited by Growl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
    • Especially since we’re neck and neck with them for the play in
×
×
  • Create New...