Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fire Scott Fitterer


FuFuLamePoo
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, MasterAwesome said:

I'm not sure my takeaway after Week 1's performance was "man, if only we had a better blocking TE".  That'd be near the bottom of my priority list.

Dude is a 6'7 freakshow.   That play was merely an example of what a freakshow can do.  Which meant stepping on the field day 1 and smoking Mr. Everything Bosa with that block.  Pretty sure we also had a turnover on 4th and 1 with the run.    That's not all he can do.  He wasn't a Tommy Tremble prospect.   He would be a freakish big target to develop for Young going forward.....in the pass game. 

That's not hindsight.  He was my pick when they went up to reach for DJ.  Thought the priority should of been on weapons for Young.  Which is still my position. 

DJ Johnson - 0 snaps week 1. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, CRA said:

Dude is a 6'7 freakshow.   That play was merely an example of what a freakshow can do.  Which meant stepping on the field day 1 and smoking Mr. Everything Bosa with that block.  Pretty sure we also had a turnover on 4th and 1 with the run.    That's not all he can do.  He wasn't a Tommy Tremble prospect.   He would be a freakish big target to develop for Young going forward.....in the pass game. 

That's not hindsight.  He was my pick when they went up to reach for DJ.  Thought the priority should of been on weapons for Young.  Which is still my position. 

DJ Johnson - 0 snaps week 1. 

As far as I remember he had a terrible attitude and turned a lot of teams off. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Martin said:

As far as I remember he had a terrible attitude and turned a lot of teams off. 

Didn't turn off Mike Tomlin.  Who hasn't had a losing season.  Ever.   Going on year 17. 

He is a freakshow and the Steelers and their players have glowed about him.  I put more on what guys do on the field and potential vs how good they might interview.  I suspect a ton of guys interview poorly.   Rookies to vets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

Dude is a 6'7 freakshow.   That play was merely an example of what a freakshow can do.  Which meant stepping on the field day 1 and smoking Mr. Everything Bosa with that block.  Pretty sure we also had a turnover on 4th and 1 with the run.    That's not all he can do.  He wasn't a Tommy Tremble prospect.   He would be a freakish big target to develop for Young going forward.....in the pass game. 

That's not hindsight.  He was my pick when they went up to reach for DJ.  Thought the priority should of been on weapons for Young.  Which is still my position. 

DJ Johnson - 0 snaps week 1. 

Again, I'm not disputing his blocking abilities which are what were on display in that one clip you showed.  He didn't even get a single target in the passing game, in a game where they were getting blown out 20-0 less than halfway into the second quarter.  Initial impressions from that stat line don't scream "pass catching weapon" to me, which is what we desperately need.  Sure it's hella premature one game into the season, but you're opening that door to premature scrutiny when you're already proclaiming him to be a big miss for our FO based off of one pass-blocking snap.  If you're being critical of DJ Johnson's 0 snaps Week 1 and through the other side of your mouth hyping Darnell Washington's potential as a receiver after a game where he didn't even get targeted, then you're applying two different standards (immediate contribution vs. future potential).

And the bold basically just reads "Warning: confirmation bias.  Will overreact to singular positive plays".  I don't think openly admitting that is helping you come across as an objective evaluator.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MasterAwesome said:

Again, I'm not disputing his blocking abilities which are what were on display in that one clip you showed.  He didn't even get a single target in the passing game, in a game where they were getting blown out 20-0 less than halfway into the second quarter.  Initial impressions from that stat line don't scream "pass catching weapon" to me, which is what we desperately need.  Sure it's hella premature one game into the season, but you're opening that door to premature scrutiny when you're already proclaiming him to be a big miss for our FO based off of one pass-blocking snap.  If you're being critical of DJ Johnson's 0 snaps Week 1 and through the other side of your mouth hyping Darnell Washington's potential as a receiver after a game where he didn't even get targeted, then you're applying two different standards (immediate contribution vs. future potential).

And the bold basically just reads "Warning: confirmation bias.  Will overreact to singular positive plays".  I don't think openly admitting that is helping you come across as an objective evaluator.

I'm critical of the DJ Johnson for lots of reasons.   Not just because he didn't play a snap.  Which was all discussed at the time. 

Washington at least played.  And did good things.  Like that clip showed.  Which is impressive given the tall task. 

 Oh, I am definitely biased here. I hated the pick.  Still hate it.  Better gambling could of been done elsewhere.   Especially given we drafted Young and his weak weapons. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not in same league. Caldwell just hit a 10.00 on the RAS. 2nd out of 3830 from 1987 onward.  https://x.com/MathBomb/status/2027885023387349047 Yeah I mean Louis had a sub 9.00 RAS. Still very very good, no doubt. Louis is small, no 2 ways about it. He is likely a sub package lb in nickel packages or specialized WLB. Be fine ST gunner to start for sure. 6 foot flat and 220lb is pushing it for a starting LB. At 10 to 20lbs less than the other LBs he'd better be closer to the top in most timed drills. He's gonna be challenged when some of the wrs in the class can matchup bigger stronger faster, much less TE in the run game.  Yeah instinct matter and he has them, but that size is a massive red flag compared to many of the other LBS in this class.    Rodriguez is the LB that really climbed this week from a pure grit guy to great flash with athleticism people wrote off cause he was a QB at first at UVA. 18.4mph in the backpedal. Production the last 2 years were great. I'd be thrilled with him as the future mike.   Hill likely moved out of 51 and into the top 45 picks ( Ravens at 45 I can't imagine don't bite if he makes it there). Honestly Hill imo is a 1st rounder and I'd be ok with him as he fits the MLB we have missed the last few years. People would crow it's a reach but he's top 30 all-time I'm RAS for a LB at 9.9+ . Plus he was big time in big games when he was healthy. And that br a big check: meds. 
    • Miller, Melo, Coby, Moose, and Bridges all on the floor at the same time must be a nightmare for defenses lol. Switch one out for Kon and still a nightmare. Coby really does bring a true 6th man value and looks like he could start if Melo was out after only a few games of getting his feet wet. 
×
×
  • Create New...