Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

All-22 Review: Panthers @ Falcons [Week 1 - 2023]


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Silent Majority said:

It's mine. Why should I be concerned because yours differs from mine. I simply do not think he is aggressive. He is safe. If I'm proven wrong so be it. Never said I disliked the kid. You all are hilarious. 

It's not bad for being different from mine. It's just bad.

Not every quarterback is a gunslinger. Nor should they be. Hell, some of the best of all time were "safe". It's part of why they were successful.

Good quarterbacking isn't limited to one style of play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mav1234 said:

There's a bit of a difference between safe and cautious.  At times last week he was cautious but in college he certainly played aggressively when he needed to.  He was a play maker by extending plays etc and I think we will see more of that as he grows... I remember some pre draft videos where he was fitting the ball into windows that would be called risky.

I can see and respect your perspective 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's not bad for being different from mine. It's just bad.

Not every quarterback is a gunslinger. Nor should they be. Hell, some of the best of all time were "safe". It's part of why they were successful.

Good quarterbacking isn't limited to one style of play.

Never said he should be a gunslinger nor that part about limiting QB play to one style.  Smh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

He's gonna overthrow receivers a lot because he's noodle-armed. 

He also took too many aggressive throws because he plays it safe all the time.

He's so even-keeled that he panics a lot.

Anything else we can add to the list?

Don’t forget he takes the check down if nothing is there instead of throwing into double coverage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Silent Majority said:

Never said he should be a gunslinger nor that part about limiting QB play to one style.  Smh

Your complaint is that he's not aggressive (doesn't have that "dawg" in him) and your original post essentially describes him as a system quarterback.

It's just not an accurate take. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Your complaint is that he's not aggressive (doesn't have that "dawg" in him) and your original post essentially describes him as a system quarterback.

It's just not an accurate take. 

"Essentially"...is your inferring not my implying. I stated what I wanted very clearly. I, like most here also watched the all 22. He made some weak decisions to check it down or make the safe throw quite a bit. Was it first game jitters? I don't know. Remains to be seen. I don't knock optimism. He probably will be very good. Probably isn't guaranteed, so behaving as though someone seeing signs is hating or way off base is ridiculous. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

He's gonna overthrow receivers a lot because he's noodle-armed. 

He also took too many aggressive throws because he plays it safe all the time.

He's so even-keeled that he panics a lot.

Anything else we can add to the list?

He didn't wear a tie before the game.  

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Silent Majority said:

"Essentially"...is your inferring not my implying. I stated what I wanted very clearly. I, like most here also watched the all 22. He made some weak decisions to check it down or make the safe throw quite a bit. Was it first game jitters? I don't know. Remains to be seen. I don't knock optimism. He probably will be very good. Probably isn't guaranteed, so behaving as though someone seeing signs is hating or way off base is ridiculous. 

I disagree with your take, but if you're willing to wait and see, that's good.

An unfortunate portion of this board isn't, which is why we've got so many silly overreactions at the moment. I won't lump you in with that bunch.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/13/2023 at 12:28 PM, Untouchable said:

Pressure is coming around what looks like the RG before or right as AT breaks that double move so it looks like me might have dropped his eyes at that point. I think he had room to step into the pocket and take that shot, but he might have went to escape where there was a free late rusher.

I’m not sure why people are considering this to be a legit deep ball play, between the pressure and there was no guarantee the safety bites either way because the ball was out 2 seconds before AT even finished the double move. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Silent Majority said:

I can see and respect your perspective 

Appreciate that! Just my thoughts. It's totally possible he'll never be aggressive in the NFL because he may never feel comfortable enough with the game to be so.  I hope that is not the case, but plenty of rookies end up playing scared at the next level. So we will see.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, both instances of references to the defense were specific to the run defense.  I should have said "run defense" the 2nd time.  You admit there has been ample personal issue but then use those stats to support your argument. I'm not arguing on the effectiveness of his specific scheme overall.  I'm saying he is only now getting the proper personal to run his scheme.  The stats are the stats and while I don't disagree with any of what you're saying, 3 years of those stats are based on the Panthers front office not giving him the tools to run a competitive NFL defense until this year with D. Brown getting healthy and the additional of Tre'von Moehrig. I want to see his defense when we don't have multiple key starter positions manned with players who would IMHO are not starting level players.  With some talent  I say all this while not being a big fan of his scheme.  I would prefer a 4-3 but that's neither here or there. And yes, I would call getting requests and interviews from other teams who want to hire him good evidence that he may be a pretty good DC and has a lot of potential as a HC. In 2022 he had HC requests from the Broncos, Colts, and Texans.  He also had requests for DC from the Vikings, Falcons and the Panthers.  We hired him to be our DC. In 2023 it was the Falcons, Raiders and Seahawks for a HC position. In 2024 the Falcons, Seahawks and the Panthers interviewd him for HC.  We blocked the Jags from a DC interview. In 2025 (which is this years hiring cycle) so far its the Falcons, Raiders and just today the Steelers, all for the HC position.  
    • The Giants still may be crap but they just improved somewhat by hiring Harbaugh,  
×
×
  • Create New...