Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Week 2 NFL games


Panthercougar68
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Yeah, We are going to regret not taking him number 1 unfortunately...

After today's game....you will be glad we have Bryce over CJ the bust, like every other Buckeyes QB like Fields. Not a single great QB came from college program unlike receivers who makes the QB looks so good.

  • Poo 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GhostWhispah said:

After today's game....you will be glad we have Bryce over CJ the bust, like every other Buckeyes QB like Fields. Not a single great QB came from college program unlike receivers who makes the QB looks so good.

What has CJ done to make you think todays game is proof he is a bust?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GhostWhispah said:

After today's game....you will be glad we have Bryce over CJ the bust, like every other Buckeyes QB like Fields. Not a single great QB came from college program unlike receivers who makes the QB looks so good.

Yeah, FSU pass rushers were well known to bust in the NFL but I'm glad we drafted Burns where we did. Bama QBs were bust city for decades. Same with USC QBs and WRs both. The program/system is certainly part of the evaluation process but I wouldn't exclude anyone solely because of where they played college ball. Air raid QBs were never supposed to work in the NFL. Enter Patrick Mahomes stage left.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...