Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Young performance graph #2

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm not saying he isn't smart. What I'm saying is that so far his mental acuity has not been able to overcome his physical limitations. We got enamored by a football mind and chose to overlook marginal NFL physical talent.

Was that ever a realistic expectation after two games?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

You're getting triggered by language. What do you choose to call it when a QB is carving a defense up leaning on their pre-snap reads and quick processing after the snap? I choose to call it outsmarting the defense left and right. You can call it whatever you choose.

Triggered? Is that all you've got? Your takes are just getting old. Maybe I've been here too long and seen too much from you to bother engaging with you anymore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
Just now, Jon Snow said:

Triggered? Is that all you've got? Your takes are just getting old. Maybe I've been here too long and seen too much from you to bother engaging with you anymore. 

Yeah, which is why you chose not to actually address my reply and continue to try to make it personal. If you've ran out of football logic that's okay, but don't be mad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brent Gregory Community Regular

Brent Gregory

Posted
Posted

I think so much was put into his mental acuity because he lacked so much in all the other areas. The hope was that part could put him on a level playing field with the other nfl qbs. So far his liabilities jump out in all areas. Not saying he won't come around and figure it out but out  of the rookie qbs he doesn't look remotely close as the others in being a quality starter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

So insults it is.

You're the only one who has resorted to insults. I said you were triggered because you are acting triggered. I assumed you ran out of football logic because you stopped addressing the football replies I made and chose to just resort to personal attacks.

What am I wrong about here? If you'd like to actually address my reply, go for it. This was where you came unglued and stopped talking about football:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
falconidae Newbie

falconidae

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

please explain the one handed sack then

Happens to every QB in the NFL. I'm sure it happened to Cam. There's strong mofos on every defense. If the QB is off balance, a good DE can knock him down with one hand. 

In this particular case, I think it's Bryce still underestimating the speed and power of NFL defensive players, If Bryce shifts a half second earlier, he doesn't go down. He'll learn.

There's a new HC, OC, QB, plus several other new players on offense. As bad as it looked first two games, it should get better over the season. Probably not translating into too many wins this year, but by the end of the year, you'll probably feel better about your QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, Shaqil915 said:

He is holding the ball too long, and doesn't seem to trust his first read. Graph below is basically inverse of OP graph, IE Tua and TLaw get rid of ball early and trust their first read so they don't get pressured as much.

Who are Tua and Lawrence throwing to again?

For that matter, when did not throwing to your first read become a bad thing? Sometimes your first read isn't open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      It is time to Consider the Likelihood of WR at #19

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      It should be a facto, because while he needs to perform to keep his job, you still have to build with an eye to the future. Where we will be drafting, there is a more than good chance of there being a player there at a position of more need, such as OT, LB, TE, S, or CB. With all those holes, I just don’t like the idea of taking a player who will ensure one of him, T-Mac, or Coker won’t be here 4 years from now, and we all know it won’t be T-Mac who gets jettisoned. So either believe in Coker or don’t, keep him and draft another position or draft a WR and trade him, don’t straddle the middle and hamstring us by leaving more holes while leaving us a huge problem a couple years from now.
    • TD alt
      Draft intel from ESPN’s Jordan Reid

      By TD alt · Posted

      Oh, now we are "top half?" Keep moving the goal posts. No we aren't. We don't have a surefire WR2, nor do we have a TE that we can count on to consistently make big plays. Our receiving corps is somewhat bland to be honest. It does not have enough juice. Add another playmaker, then we'll likely be top half. Our receiving corps ranked somewhere between 20 and 25 in the league depending upon who you look at. No one has us in the top half based upon last season.
    • MHS831
      It is time to Consider the Likelihood of WR at #19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      It is hard to say--if you look back at our roster from 4 years ago...In addition, we have a ton of money going into our OL right now (which might strengthen the argument to draft a tackle now)  The average NFL career is under 4 years, but the average NFL career for first rounders is 9.3 years, so most get 2 contracts.   So having said that, I look at it as capital--if your concern (legit) becomes an issue, then you should have the same vision and trade that player and draft his replacement.  However, TMAC, Coker, and a rookie is not likely to be a problem for another 4 years--2030.   But to your point, we have a situation right now that the OL has 2 guards and a RT around or over 30.  The make about $70m per year.   I like the perspective of reality you bring, however.  Is that a factor to morgan in 2026?  
×
×
  • Create New...