Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Miles Sanders...


Hoenheim
 Share

Recommended Posts

4.0 ypc  vs Falcons 

3.1 ypc vs Saints 

2.7 ypc vs Seahawks 

Pretty underwhelming considering what we were doing with Foreman last year. It's also sort of baffling they don't even try to use the other backs much.

The panthers have made so many shitty moves from draft picks to free agents man. Jesus Christ man.

Edited by Hoenheim
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still trying to figure out what his strength is. It's not catching, not speed, not strength, not ball security, not blocking...I think Gantt said we didn't keep Foreman because he didn't fit our scheme or something lol. We don't have an identity and last years run game would have been a good foundation to build off of but they said no thanks we'll scrap the one thing we were good at

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Dave Gettleman's Shorts said:

miles been disappointing but all of our run plays is a HB dive up the middle from shotgun

Which is Chuba's game, but for some reason if he does get a snap he gets a screen pass. Maybe they got Miles and Chubas jersey numbers mixed up or something 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Same thing Viska did to get phased out for no fuging reason.  Reich sucks.

I think Dalton should start a couple more games and if Tepper has brass balls he should tell Reich to let Brown call the plays. 0-3 isn't making the playoffs either way so why even waste everyones time running this dinosaur offense. Go ahead and see if you want to retain everyone but Reich next year

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Our running game as a whole sucks right now. Many reasons for it. Talent at the RB position isn't it.

It was fine game 1 until they basically benched Chuba and Blackshear and decided to throw the ball 80% of the time even when the score was close. I really hope Reich likes Cohen or something so his stubborn ass will try something new

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think it’s a coincidence that Sanders ypc has dropped in each game and our offensive guard combo has been different each game.

Cade Mays is an okay run blocker but is abysmal at pass blocking so he got benched. Throckmorton can at least keep the pocket from immediately collapsing but gets zero push in the run game.

If Corbett comes back at 80-90% of what he was last season and Sanders still struggles then it will be worth revisiting this conversation.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

It was fine game 1 until they basically benched Chuba and Blackshear and decided to throw the ball 80% of the time even when the score was close. I really hope Reich likes Cohen or something so his stubborn ass will try something new

Defenses are stacking the line. Until we can keep defenses honest, we're going to struggle to consistently run the ball.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, pantherclaw said:

Defenses are stacking the line. Until we can keep defenses honest, we're going to struggle to consistently run the ball.

Yeah. Pretty sure we once again didn't run any pre snap motion or hint of play action. You can't even attempt play action if you only run 10 times in a whole game. Just because Miles didn't run well in the first 5 minutes wasn't a good reason to not try Chuba or Viska in some backfield capacity

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah. Pretty sure we once again didn't run any pre snap motion or hint of play action. You can't even attempt play action if you only run 10 times in a whole game. Just because Miles didn't run well in the first 5 minutes wasn't a good reason to not try Chuba or Viska in some backfield capacity

I felt they were attacking the defense the best that they could.  

I, myself, love running the ball. So I'll always want them to run more.  

I still have to keep an open mind and truly analyze why they aren't running more, when I feel they should be. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...