Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hurney on 2010 QB's


AKPantherFan

Recommended Posts

On Panther Talk they asked what the QB situation looks like for 2010;

hE SAID that Matt Moore is looking great and with a 5-2 record as a starter they like what they they have.

He said they Like the group they have, but will look at the football team in the offseason...

he even said that they like Jake as a veteran.. :P

not_awesome_smiley.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This last game will either make or break Matt Moore's chances at starting next season. I think the Front Office now knows they don't need to rush and grab a QB from the draft or FA immediately. Sure bring a new young guy in here to learn but they won't give anyone the reigns except Moore/Delhomme. I like what he said about Delhomme being a vet, it was my favorite thing he ever did, or even said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possible, if Fox declares "open competition" for camp.

If they return only the current group, barring some ultimate disaster, I don't see any way you can justify not starting Moore next season.

I agree, I'm not saying McCown should be the starter but I am certain Fox will not go into next season with Moore as the slated starting QB. Even though it should be Moore's to lose. Just basing this on Fox's love for the vet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Moore puts in another stellar performance, particularly sans Smith (Which I somewhat doubt he will, no knock on the guy, but it won't be easy), he'll be the unquestioned #1 going into training camp... if he loses that job to one of the others, er, well, darn. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...