Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

1st Down Run Game


Proudiddy
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Did Bryce play in week 3?

So, 1 week is a trend?

I dont know what the stats were for 1st down against Seattle, but I know the run game sucked and we barely used Chuba or Viska out of the backfield, which also makes a difference.  And yet, the offense looked the best it has in a full month of football.

I'm pretty sure if we take Seattle out of the equation, the stats aren't much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

So, 1 week is a trend?

I dont know what the stats were for 1st down against Seattle, but I know the run game sucked and we barely used Chuba or Viska out of the backfield, which also makes a difference.  And yet, the offense looked the best it has in a full month of football.

I'm pretty sure if we take Seattle out of the equation, the stats aren't much better.

Your post says "I guess it's what you do when you dont trust your super processor."
 

Which you are eluding to the fact we are running on 1st downs specifically bc of Bryce.. but we did the same thing with Dalton.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eyes don't lie. We run Sanders up our trash guard's ass every fuggin 1st down. It's infuriating. The same godamn play too. Not motion, no stretch play, no trap blocks, just your basic HB dive right up the fuggin gut. Colts fans laughing their asses off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

So, 1 week is a trend?

I dont know what the stats were for 1st down against Seattle, but I know the run game sucked and we barely used Chuba or Viska out of the backfield, which also makes a difference.  And yet, the offense looked the best it has in a full month of football.

I'm pretty sure if we take Seattle out of the equation, the stats aren't much better.

The offense looked better with a former 10 year starter and strong veteran? You don’t say! 
 

Your little graphic from Instagram is also an inclination on just how bad the play calling is incapacitating Bryce’s ability to play the position as well as you would like him to. He is constantly put in 3rd and long due to Franks insistence on establishing the running game. Our WRs can’t create separation either due to their own inability or poor situational play calling and design. The “star LT” can’t block a blitzing 34 year old safety on the most pivotal play of the game and the unit itself has been pretty dysfunctional in giving Bryce any type of time to manipulate the pocket which is what he is good at. 
 

The team is doing Bryce no favors. Poor talent and perhaps the most incompetent display of play-calling currently in the NFL is going a long way to perpetuate this false narrative of Bryce. Stop expecting him to be Cam. 

Edited by USDepartmentOfSavagery
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...