Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

When we start 0-6....


uncfan888
 Share

If we start 0-6, should someone be fired during the bye week?   

67 members have voted

  1. 1. Who should be gone?

    • Fitterer
      55
    • Reich
      43
    • Tepper
      30


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Captroop said:

Sigh. As much as it pains me, I don't think anyone will or should be fired.

Dan Campbell in his first year lost 14 straight. And here in year 3 he's got his squad looking ready to run the North. 

We probably do need to give this regime more than 6 games to get the ball rolling or we run the risk of just being the perennial losers of the league with constant turnover and turmoil.

 

 

...That doesn't mean I have to watch this flaming shitwreck of a season.

Lions paired up their HC/GM when they hired Dan Campbell 

the Lions fired their OC after year 1.  You always got to have someone to finger point 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bryce Young legit looks like the worst QB in the NFL 4 weeks in. 

Whether that's him, Reichs system or Fitts players remains to be seen but outside of maybe like 3-5 throws all year he has not flashed at all. 

When we get to 0-6 the seats going to get warm... If we drop the next 2 to the Bears and Texans to fall to 0-8 and there's been no improvement from the offense someone (likely Fitt) is going to be fired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't believe it's as easy as saying that anyone believes that Rico had the 10th best day on offense. Grades are done in a vacuum inasmuch as they can be. By their very nature, skill positions are always going to account for more "production" in reference to stats, and RBs perhaps even more than WRs because they touch the ball more. You can't look at PFF's grading system, or any football grading/grading system (like perhaps Football Outsiders or Next Gen Stats), so simplistically. If a player has an excellent day, relative to his position, relative to his assignments, and relative to his number of snaps, then he should be graded highly. It's up to the reader (or the analyst, if you will) to put what you're seeing into context, and that's not only in relation to the grades, but the general situation (like whether a player is playing injured, who they're playing with or against---the general situation). Even the fact that (presumably) PFF or news outlets put out a list of the highest and lowest grades, that doesn't mean that said players were the most impactful of the day, it just means that they did or didn't do their job the best, based upon a certain set of parameters. PFF is a part of life for football analysts, talking heads, execs, coaches, players, and even fans (even if indirectly), all to varying degrees. It is a tool that is used by all 32 teams. Obviously it's not viewed so dismissively by franchises as a whole. Execs obviously don't look at it as a bunch of bozos making sh¡t up on the fly. Fans can berate it or swear by it, but it isn't going anywhere.  The only thing that I can tell you is that perspective and context matters.
    • Im not big in to PFF but their guys were raving about his blocking along with our other skill players in the run game. https://youtu.be/D4kL_N97cFQ?si=sJWSZCUA1bj5otyx  
×
×
  • Create New...