Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Spider man Scrapped

scpanther22

By scpanther22,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

scpanther22 Mentor

scpanther22

Posted
Posted

They where all bad IMO

Mike Fleming and Nikki Finke have just confirmed that Sony Pictures decided today to reboot the Spider-Man franchise after franchise director Sam Raimi pulled out of Spider-Man 4 because he felt he couldn't make its summer release date and keep the film's creative integrity

http://www.deadline.com/hollywood/urgent-spider-man-4-scrapped-as-is-raimi-and-cast-out-franchise-reboot-planned/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitterne.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captroop Grand Master

Captroop

Posted
Posted

Way to soon for a reboot. Best thing to do is shelve it for a while, then reboot it. It just seems cheap to remake a movie that's only 9 years old. Come on, at least give me a decade. How about instead of another Spiderman sequel, they put a little effort into the Deadpool movie so it doesn't end up like XMO:Wolverine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
scpanther22 Mentor

scpanther22

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I would like to see a darker more dramatic version of Spider Man like how they turned Batman into what it is now from the Comic booky cartoony feel the other ones used to be (except maybe the very first.)

I hope so too.I know for the fantastic 4 reboot they want a darker movie but IDK about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zaximus Veteran

Zaximus

Posted
Posted

Way to soon for a reboot. Best thing to do is shelve it for a while, then reboot it. It just seems cheap to remake a movie that's only 9 years old. Come on, at least give me a decade. How about instead of another Spiderman sequel, they put a little effort into the Deadpool movie so it doesn't end up like XMO:Wolverine.

It's not really the same. Spider-Man rights are owned by Sony I believe, even though Marvel is involved Sony is the main guy. It wasn't until after the spider-man movies that Marvel started doing movies them selfs (Iron Man and Hulk).

And yes the spider-man movies sucked. You can't really make spider-man super dark anyway, but it could have been better and had better acting (Toby is horrible).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jensen Newbie

Jensen

Posted
Posted

I would like to see a darker more dramatic version of Spider Man like how they turned Batman into what it is now from the Comic booky cartoony feel the other ones used to be (except maybe the very first.)

Not sure Spidey's character would fit into that

Link to comment
Share on other sites
faultlessjoint Newbie

faultlessjoint

Posted
Posted

It's not going to be a complete reboot like Batman or Hulk, but more of a shift in direction and style.

Columbia Pictures originally signed on to make 6 spider man movies. I remember after the first one came out that the big rumor was they would likely end up being two trilogies. Where the first three would have one cast/style/director and the second three would have a completely different cast/style/director.

Personally I'm all for it. I thought Spider-Man 3 sucked bawls and could use a different take on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Hey You, You Don't Know Quarterbacking

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      It's not even a particularly nuanced opinion, yet it seems out of reach for so many.
    • strato
      Bryce's Achilles Heel Is Not What You Think It Is

      By strato · Posted

      I don’t think he can be great. For me he tops out as starter maybe make the playoffs, stuff like that. I would have been okay with that kind of player as a placeholder but you don’t invest the time and assets we did and be happy with that.  On the cure,If a guy has mechanical flaws but otherwise is enticing, you let someone else make the mistake of taking him in the top of the 1st. If he doesn’t get taken you can pick him up 2nd or 3rd day and try to develop him (off the bench not starting).  The risk/reward with Bryce was horribly misjudged. I didn’t want to trade like that in the first place because I didn’t see the generation talent that justifies that type of move, but once it was done CJ was the better gamble. No doubt. 
    • kungfoodude
      Hey You, You Don't Know Quarterbacking

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      That's what I mean. If you claim to possess some super knowledge about the QB position from a previous non-football but football related job, wouldn't you want to expound upon that to support this "everyone doesn't know anything about being a QB" thesis? The rest is just summed up by stating that there are a lot of variables to a QB being successful. Yeah....I mean that isn't earth shattering.  While there is certainly a lot of luck involved in all manners of success, consistent success with the variables around you also changing on a regular basis is usually fairly conclusive.  Is Trent Dilfer the same as Tom Brady? Is Nick Foles the same as Patrick Mahomes? I supposed based on the OP's arguments, they are. That's not really the way it turned out, however.  The NFL isn't unlike most other jobs or even other sports. The cream typically does rise to the top on a more consistent basis. Is it accidental that premier poker players seem to win or perform very well on a consistent basis, give that any individual hand is largely luck?  
×
×
  • Create New...