Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just speculating... I wouldn't be surprised if Frank or Fitt is fired soon. Very soon.

TylerDurden

By TylerDurden,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted

Mr. Scot has his ways but I don't think we should be pushing him out the door. He has value as a contributor.

That being said. The propensity for being a company line man when it suits him makes me feel like my eyes are going to roll right back into my head. Especially when it comes to the subject of Scott Fitterer whom apparently is not a "bad" GM in his eyes which absolutely astounds me considering the venom he's had for Hurney. Say what you want about Marty at least he did draft some All-Pro caliber players along the way. I'm still waiting to see the first one from Fitterer. We need a new front office.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Here's the good thing, though...

There's a pretty definitive answer to this question from Thomas Brown himself.

I can link it for you if you like 🫥

again, you operate under the premise that everything NFL teams and coaches say is true.  Well, pending it agrees with your narrative. I don't.  NFL teams and coaches have proven to peddle bullshit essentially all the time.  They aren't in the business of speaking the truth to the public.  They are largely in the business of telling folks what they want you to hear. 

and then when NFL teams prove to pump out bullshit year round....you then refuse to acknowledge that fact the next time you are lecturing off of what the present Panther PR happens to be. 

So yeah, if it looks like a duck (SD) and acts like a duck (Indy) then it probably is a duck (Carolina).   It's Frank Reich's base offense.  Which is why he was set on being in control.  That's my stance and it's certainly rooted in sound logic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, poundaway said:

 

Capturasde.JPG.2ab402fb6ca23bb443b1b13684b62b44.JPG

Yeah, its amazing.

I mean, I called that too.  Just a refresher.....you, like Matt Rhule attempted to do, attempted to scapegoat that utter dumpster fire on Joe Brady lol.   I told you Joe Brady wasn't the real problem. He was what he was.  The real problem the Matt Rhule.  Painful to see someone still in a Matt Rhule defender mindset. Which apparently still got you scrambled up lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
poundaway Grand Master

poundaway

Posted
Posted (edited)
42 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, I called that too.  Just a refresher.....you, like Matt Rhule attempted to do, attempted to scapegoat that utter dumpster fire on Joe Brady lol.   I told you Joe Brady wasn't the real problem. He was what he was.  The real problem the Matt Rhule.  Painful to see someone still in a Matt Rhule defender mindset. Which apparently still got you scrambled up lol. 

Yeah.  Thats why you had change your avatar.  Because you were right.

Edited by poundaway
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, poundaway said:

Yeah.  Thats why you had change your avatar.  Because you were right.

I lost an avatar. But was proven correct about what the bet was about.  That Joe Brady wasn't the primary issue.  Matt Rhule was. 

I mean, the Joe Brady window was still the best offensive window the Matt Rhule era ever saw.  He was your boogeyman.  Matt Rhule and you needed him to be in order for the Matt Rhule charade to keep going.   Thankfully Matt Rhule proved me right beyond a shadow of a doubt (well, one doubt it appears is still being clung to lol). 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, frankw said:

Mr. Scot has his ways but I don't think we should be pushing him out the door. He has value as a contributor.

That being said. The propensity for being a company line man when it suits him makes me feel like my eyes are going to roll right back into my head. Especially when it comes to the subject of Scott Fitterer whom apparently is not a "bad" GM in his eyes which absolutely astounds me considering the venom he's had for Hurney. Say what you want about Marty at least he did draft some All-Pro caliber players along the way. I'm still waiting to see the first one from Fitterer. We need a new front office.

Not real clear on what's "company line" about accepting that Thomas Brown wrote the playbook when he himself says he did.

Are our tinfoil hats wrapped so tight that we can't even accept a simple detail like this? 😳

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ECHornet
      Known Prospect Meetings with Panthers

      By ECHornet · Posted

      Taking only players from the sheet that are realistically available in or after the listed round, I’d like… 1st: DT Caleb Banks (Styles not realistic) 2nd: LB Jacob Rodriguez 3rd: OT Best available from Bowry, Barber, and Casey 4th: CB Daylen Everette 5th: S Jalen Huskey 6th: RB Adam Randall 7th: IOL Best available from Lemieux, Dawkins, Leausa, and Brose   I know nothing about some of the players listed, but it seems like that would be the best way it could fall for now. I’m sure the list of who we meet will change a ton, and there will also be players we don’t meet with to keep quiet. I’d love to pick up Randall in the late rounds. 
    • LinvilleGorge
      Tight End: The Need is Bigger than We Think

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Not what I said. They know within the building why we aren't utilizing TEs more. If the rumors were true that we were seriously pursuing a couple of decent receiving TEs that strongly points toward a lack of quality receiving TEs currently on the roster. Does that mean we consider drafting one at 19? I don't know, but it wouldn't shock me and if we did there's only one guy it would be. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see TE drafting somewhere in the first three rounds. 
    • strato
      Known Prospect Meetings with Panthers

      By strato · Posted

      Yeah, I don’t know. Tepper was behind the Bryce selection. Behind firings and hiring over his lack of development.  He doesn’t have to literally tell them their hands are tied for them to know this. It is in the air constantly. The Canales Bryce play calling was even portrayed by more than one person as Canales failing Bryce, instead of Bryce being responsible for his own performance (except when he does well, then it is all him). Now they have an extra coach in, to help the new OC get results from this QB.  The atmosphere is not welcoming to prototypical young QBs that have talent. You get Jake Plummer types or old vets. I think we are stuck. 
×
×
  • Create New...