Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Barnwell: Panthers have the slowest WR routes in the NFL


Dorian Gray
 Share

Recommended Posts

Don't think this is shocking to anyone.

Quote

In total, 110 wide receivers have run 50 routes or more this season. In terms of average max speed per route per NFL Next Gen Stats, Carolina's leading wideouts rank 44th (Thielen), 78th (Chark), 85th (Terrace Marshall) and 88th (Mingo). Speed isn't everything, but the Panthers don't have the pass protection or the running game to survive when big plays haven't been coming.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/insider/insider/story/_/id/38607758/ranking-nfl-worst-teams-2023-season-giants-patriots-panthers-bears-broncos-vikings

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the type of routes run have a lot to do with it.  Since we hardly ever go deep we don't have many routes that enable a WR to run full speed so it throws off the whole average.  

I'd like to see the details of that stat and how it's calculated.

But it still can tell you that either the concepts, types of routes or playcalling are not allowing our WR to play as fast as possible or that on average we have too many receivers that are below average in speed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, scpanther22 said:

Mingo never played as fast as his 40 suggest that was evident even in his college film 

40 time isn't everything for sure and good route runners will be faster on the field than bad route runners, but when everyone has good 40 tikes and everyone is playing slow there's a bigger problem than the physical speed of the players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Loyalty4Life said:

Because it's how fast you run the route, which probably includes getting off jams, cutting, changing directions, etc.

Makes since why Thielen would be our fastest.

Actually it's just the max speed on the route. So you could suck getting off the line, making your breaks, etc. as long as you were running fast somewhere along the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Actually it's just the max speed on the route. So you could suck getting off the line, making your breaks, etc. as long as you were running fast somewhere along the way.

Yet, I would think that all of those things contribute to a WR being able to get up to his max speed on a given route.  Short area quickness or how quickly a guy accelerate could also play key roles which is why I'd love to see the methodology in play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

So why is this? I mean, we all knew Thielen had lost a step so that's not surprising. But DJ Chark ran a 4.34. TMJ ran a 4.38. Mingo ran a 4.46. 

These guys are fast. How are we making them look slow? This is a coaching/system issue more than it is a physical lack of speed issue.

40 speed largely tells you how fast you run a 40.   Which isn’t football.   There are routes where a Hunter Renfrow will look and be faster than DJ Chark.  Chark would smoke him in a timed 40 yard dash though. 

route running matters. We don’t have the OL or playcalling to capitalize and use Chark’s vertical speed. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

40 speed largely tells you how fast you run a 40.   Which isn’t football.   There are routes where a Hunter Renfrow will look and be faster than DJ Chark.  Chark would smoke him in a timed 40 yard dash though. 

route running matters. We don’t have the OL or playcalling to capitalize and use Chark’s vertical speed. 

Rout running absolutely matters but fast is fast. If you're fast you're just gonna run a sloppy route but you're gonna do it moving fast. It won't be crisp, it might not be right, you might be rounding off your cuts, etc. But you're going to physically be moving fast even if you're not getting A to B on the field efficiently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Rout running absolutely matters but fast is fast. If you're fast you're just gonna run a sloppy route but you're gonna do it moving fast. It won't be crisp, it might not be right, you might be rounding off your cuts, etc. But you're going to physically be moving fast even if you're not getting A to B on the field efficiently.

If that were true then the list would be in order of 40 times and it's not so there must be other factors contributing to it. 

Otherwise, explain to me how Thielen is so far ahead of Chark?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Loyalty4Life said:

If that were true then the list would be in order of 40 times and it's not so there must be other factors contributing to it. 

Otherwise, explain to me how Thielen is so far ahead of Chark?

Types of routes matter a lot. You're not gonna run a drag as fast as a g you're not going to run a slant as fast as a post. When everyone is fast and they're all playing slow it's probably not because of each individual player. That's all I'm saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...