Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Smoke--EM------Keep--EM


PensacolaPanther

Recommended Posts

Being that i'm not a salary cap guru I really can't say. Unless you want to throw all salary cap ramafications of cut players aside and just cut willy-nilly?

Good point. While there isn't a salary cap for 2010, it isn't like you can just cut wildly without having ramifications down the road when presumably there will be a cap.

If this were Madden though instead of reality then you could play along and not worry about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being that i'm not a salary cap guru I really can't say. Unless you want to throw all salary cap ramafications of cut players aside and just cut willy-nilly?

just cutting willy-nilly I would say...

-Jake - thanks for the good times but you aren't a backup or competition

-Moose- thanks for the good times but in another year you will be too painful to watch and we don't need a TE playing WR

-Jarrett - thanks for the good times and now go to an offense that will let you play like a fairy yet take advantage of your hands.

*Charles Godfrey - congrats on a stong finish and noticeable improvement....as you were on pace to make the list but can stay....but I still felt the need to call you out based on 85% of your career starts being so pathetic (but you are young).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just cutting willy-nilly I would say...

-Jake - thanks for the good times but you aren't a backup or competition

-Moose- thanks for the good times but in another year you will be too painful to watch and we don't need a TE playing WR

-Jarrett - thanks for the good times and now go to an offense that will let you play like a fairy yet take advantage of your hands.

*Charles Godfrey - congrats on a stong finish and noticeable improvement....as you were on pace to make the list but can stay....but I still felt the need to call you out based on 85% of your career starts being so pathetic (but you are young).

LoL "fairy"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just cutting willy-nilly I would say...

-Jake - thanks for the good times but you aren't a backup or competition

-Moose- thanks for the good times but in another year you will be too painful to watch and we don't need a TE playing WR

-Jarrett - thanks for the good times and now go to an offense that will let you play like a fairy yet take advantage of your hands.

*Charles Godfrey - congrats on a stong finish and noticeable improvement....as you were on pace to make the list but can stay....but I still felt the need to call you out based on 85% of your career starts being so pathetic (but you are young).

Perfect example of why you need salary money and contract info to make decisions. All of these sound good on the surface but you wouldn't make any of these moves.

Moose is not under contract for 2010 so you can't cut what you don't have.

Jake gets paid whether he plays or not. No need to cut him until the ned of prseason or camp if at all.

Jarrett and Godfrey are on their rookie contracts and are very cheap. You wouldn't cut either unless you thought they weren't good enough to be 3rd or 4th in depth. And IMO they are clear good enough for a roster spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
    • Best part is if we draft him, we can also use him as our fourth and one QB sneaker
×
×
  • Create New...