Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Smoke--EM------Keep--EM


PensacolaPanther

Recommended Posts

Being that i'm not a salary cap guru I really can't say. Unless you want to throw all salary cap ramafications of cut players aside and just cut willy-nilly?

Good point. While there isn't a salary cap for 2010, it isn't like you can just cut wildly without having ramifications down the road when presumably there will be a cap.

If this were Madden though instead of reality then you could play along and not worry about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being that i'm not a salary cap guru I really can't say. Unless you want to throw all salary cap ramafications of cut players aside and just cut willy-nilly?

just cutting willy-nilly I would say...

-Jake - thanks for the good times but you aren't a backup or competition

-Moose- thanks for the good times but in another year you will be too painful to watch and we don't need a TE playing WR

-Jarrett - thanks for the good times and now go to an offense that will let you play like a fairy yet take advantage of your hands.

*Charles Godfrey - congrats on a stong finish and noticeable improvement....as you were on pace to make the list but can stay....but I still felt the need to call you out based on 85% of your career starts being so pathetic (but you are young).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just cutting willy-nilly I would say...

-Jake - thanks for the good times but you aren't a backup or competition

-Moose- thanks for the good times but in another year you will be too painful to watch and we don't need a TE playing WR

-Jarrett - thanks for the good times and now go to an offense that will let you play like a fairy yet take advantage of your hands.

*Charles Godfrey - congrats on a stong finish and noticeable improvement....as you were on pace to make the list but can stay....but I still felt the need to call you out based on 85% of your career starts being so pathetic (but you are young).

LoL "fairy"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just cutting willy-nilly I would say...

-Jake - thanks for the good times but you aren't a backup or competition

-Moose- thanks for the good times but in another year you will be too painful to watch and we don't need a TE playing WR

-Jarrett - thanks for the good times and now go to an offense that will let you play like a fairy yet take advantage of your hands.

*Charles Godfrey - congrats on a stong finish and noticeable improvement....as you were on pace to make the list but can stay....but I still felt the need to call you out based on 85% of your career starts being so pathetic (but you are young).

Perfect example of why you need salary money and contract info to make decisions. All of these sound good on the surface but you wouldn't make any of these moves.

Moose is not under contract for 2010 so you can't cut what you don't have.

Jake gets paid whether he plays or not. No need to cut him until the ned of prseason or camp if at all.

Jarrett and Godfrey are on their rookie contracts and are very cheap. You wouldn't cut either unless you thought they weren't good enough to be 3rd or 4th in depth. And IMO they are clear good enough for a roster spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/versatile-2nd-db-named-panthers-154026075.html Smith-Wade's ability to play corner, nickel and safety makes him valuable to a young defense trying to rebuild after finishing last in the NFL a year ago. "Chau took advantage of an opportunity,'' coach Dave Canales said. "He made tackles. He had an opportunity on an interception, and he made it.'' Our defense has got to come alive for us to have a chance of winning our Division!
    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
×
×
  • Create New...