Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reich handing over playcalling to Brown

UNCrules2187

By UNCrules2187,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
48 minutes ago, UNCrules2187 said:

My hope is that the game management will improve at the least with Frank not focused on the down-to-down playcalling. The decision making and time management have been atrocious, and that's not even mentioning calling plays for players not on the field. Implement a vision, empower your lieutenants, then focus on the big picture managing of the game. It never made sense to me why Reich was insistent on being the playcaller.  

Ego, mostly

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
joemac Grand Master

joemac

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

Depends on if Tepper is the one you hate the most or not.

If Tepper is the devil, it was Frank’s epiphany that Brown will be better for the team than Tepper telling Frank what plays to call.

If Tepper isn’t the devil, it was during one of the meetings with Frank where Tepper asked him why he hadn’t handed over play calling to Brown and Frank had no answer except maybe it will be better.

Maybe the bye week was always the plan, unless of course the offense was cooking from jump.  Which it has not lmao. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

Depends on if Tepper is the one you hate the most or not.

If Tepper is the devil, it was Frank’s epiphany that Brown will be better for the team than Tepper telling Frank what plays to call.

If Tepper isn’t the devil, it was during one of the meetings with Frank where Tepper asked him why he hadn’t handed over play calling to Brown and Frank had no answer except maybe it will be better.

Tepper is horrific/the devil......and Tepper most likely forced Frank into a fairly obvious decision.  Frank and other folks have made it to clear of Tepper's unhappiness and involvement.  And that was an easy call for Tepper to enforce on his coach at the 0-6 bye. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BeenPounding Rising Star

BeenPounding

Posted
Posted

Houston won't be able to prepare for our offense.

The Colts are trash in an even trashier division.

Titans, see Colts

The Bears had better not beat us.  Jesus Christ they better not.

The Bucs aren't good.

The Falcons aren't good.  I'd argue we would have beat them if we played them last week.

The Saints aren't good and look ready to fall apart.

The Packers looked exposed last time out, not world beaters.

I'm just throwing it out there

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • Dave Gettleman's Shorts
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By Dave Gettleman's Shorts · Posted

      adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
    • PNW_PantherMan
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      You're really gonna pass up the opportunity to make a joke about skidmarks in underwear here?  Alright fine.
×
×
  • Create New...