Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can Bryce Young throw deep?

Loyalty4Life

By Loyalty4Life,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Newtcase Mentor

Newtcase

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

What does Jim Rome say? Don't confuse not having done something with not having the ability to do it.

Who gives a fug what Jim Rome says?  We’re 0-6 with a #1 draft pick that you clowns can’t produce a single deep shot clip from.  I’m sure he’ll throw one eventually and it’ll be hilarious watching you guys high five each other as we lose another game by three touchdowns.

Edited by Newtcase
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
Just now, top dawg said:

Why? You already said this very night that he can't throw deep. 

Still salty I see. He cannot to this point throw deep in the NFL. We haven't seen it. The video doesn't exist. Alabama highlights mean nothing to anyone. Hopefully we get a highlight or two of this for the first time at home against the Texans and the #2 pick in this years draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Loyalty4Life Experienced

Loyalty4Life

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, frankw said:

Still salty I see. He cannot to this point throw deep in the NFL. We haven't seen it. The video doesn't exist. Alabama highlights mean nothing to anyone. Hopefully we get a highlight or two of this for the first time at home against the Texans and the #2 pick in this years draft.

Has not or Can not?

Words and what they mean matter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Newtcase Mentor

Newtcase

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Loyalty4Life said:

Tell me why?  Please for the love of god, tell me why he has not done it?

Why, why, why, why, why??  Pretty please.  Humor me and explain it to me like I have above average intelligence.

I’m not going to debate the whys with someone that’ll just rebut with theories and conjecture.  I know your game.  I’ll just stand on the facts of the matter.  He hasn’t done it, not once.  He’s had clean pockets, he’s had open receivers.  The evidence is already out there and easy to find.  He hasn’t shown any accuracy on his deep passes under any circumstance.  This is just the way it is.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
Just now, Newtcase said:

Who gives a fug what Jim Rome says?  We’re 0-6 with a #1 draft pick that you clowns can’t produce a single deep shot clip from.  I’m sure he’ll throw one eventually and it’ll be hilarious watching you guys high five each other as we lose another game by three touchdowns.

You obviously don't understand the concept of suspect coaching, awful play calling and a porous line having a limiting effect. No context whatsoever.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, frankw said:

Still salty I see. He cannot to this point throw deep in the NFL. We haven't seen it. The video doesn't exist. Alabama highlights mean nothing to anyone. Hopefully we get a highlight or two of this for the first time at home against the Texans and the #2 pick in this years draft.

Salty ain't the word when someone basically tries to lie on you, but anyway you said what you said without qualification.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Loyalty4Life said:

Has not or Can not?

Words and what they mean matter?

College highlights don't matter now.

This is like if Cleveland Browns fans were posting highlights of Johnny Manziel in college when things weren't looking good early on.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, top dawg said:

Salty ain't the word when someone basically tries to lie on you, but anyway you said what you said without qualification.

You are absolutely livid about being called out for sticking up for David Tepper. I won't be kind anymore. You stuck your neck out for that man. You got your nose rubbed in it. Deal with it like a man.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      An Offensive Tackle for the Long Term, but....

      By TD alt · Posted

      First, apologies @MHS831, I know you began this about tackles, and it was good. But... Frank, your post is just another Bryce sucks post. You obviously believe, like your buddy, that if we draft a WR it's all about evaluating Bryce Young or coddling Bryce Young. In short, it would be about improving the damned team. If anything, if Bryce is as destined to fail (or is already a failure right now... irredeemable), then another playmaker at WR would just seal the envelope and send him on his way. In my world, that's a good thing.  If some of you think that Bryce is a lame duck, then why wouldn't you want to set the offense up for the next QB to come in and be dropped into the offense to have success? Or, maybe you think it's all a moot point anyway because Tepper sucks, Dan Morgan sucks, Canales sucks, Ejiro sucks, Brandt Tilis sucks---everybidy sucks! If that's the case, then why does anyone care who or what we draft? Obviously some of you have all the answers and can run a gotdamn franchise better than the FO does now.
    • Swaggasaurus
      An Offensive Tackle for the Long Term, but....

      By Swaggasaurus · Posted

      Yeah man, idk. I’m not super big on looking at the position group overall and damning the group. I’ll do the same with less words for WR. I think Proctor is the ultimate fit because he could be your future left or right tackle or left or right guard. Guys a starter, how much Zavala, Christensen, Curhan, and Corbett did we see last year again? Mauigoa will not be there when we pick, but you take him for the same reason you take Proctor minus maybe the LT. Freeling *could* be an upgrade at LT for the future. You don’t take Miller or Iheanahor because the position flexibility isn’t there, likely RT only guys. Those Utah guys are light in the ass, don’t want. Now I do WR. All extremely unproductive when compared to previous Round 1 WR. Tate- Gone Lemon- Complete player, not a burner, would take at 19 Tyson- Made of glass, Colorado washout  Cooper- Not the best hands. Like 300 of his yards were lucky ass stumble blooper looking poo. Bernard gives you similar but better in the 2nd. KC- Slaps then catches the ball. Lightning fast for about 20 yards. Good return man. poo QBs probably more to unlock. Would take at 19 if Proctor, Freeling, Lemon were gone. Washington guy- Lumbers, the smoothness Canales hyped for TMac, not there with him. We need a different style player.    
    • frankw
      2026 Charlotte Hornets

      By frankw · Posted

      Logically yes. Boston has the right balance though. Jalen Brown is #2 in the paint and their best shooters are 17th and 19th. While our best shooters are #1 and #2 and we have one player in the top 50 for points in the paint. And my understanding looking at the information I just referenced is we were basically at the exact same paint percentage last year in Charles Lee's offense. At the end of the day we either want to compete for a playoff series winner and the finals or we just want to stumble our way to another play in. We've already done that with James Borrego.
×
×
  • Create New...