Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Defensive transition next season?

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

Here's a question born from discussion in another thread.

Knowing how DC Ron Meeks has operated in the past - with defenses made up predominantly of undersized, speedy guys - I have to wonder a bit what the offseason will look like on the defensive side of the ball.

Will we see the Panthers move to pick up more players that fit Meeks' previous MO, or will they continue with the kind of personnel that Fox has tended to prefer and ask Meeks to tailor his attack to the strengths of those players?

Which option is the best approach?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mesmer Newbie

Mesmer

Posted
Posted

Which option is the best approach? Or which option is most likely?

Honestly when you have a system in place that works, I'd like to see Meeks get more of "his" players. Unfortunately, I think it's always going to be the kinds of players Fox wants. So, I'm going to have to say that's probably a negative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jangler Newbie

Jangler

Posted
Posted

Meeks seem to do alright with the type of players that were here. His defenses were never this good in Indy, so maybe there is something to the way Fox and Hurney have built it. Input from Meeks sure, but why change what seems to be working already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Which option is the best approach? Or which option is most likely?

Honestly when you have a system in place that works, I'd like to see Meeks get more of "his" players. Unfortunately, I think it's always going to be the kinds of players Fox wants. So, I'm going to have to say that's probably a negative.

Is that really a negative though?

Meeks' Indy defenses were built on the principle that teams would always be playing catch up against Peyton. Therefore they could tailor more to the pass than the run. That condition doesn't apply here. And unfortunately, teams found they could run on the Colts defense and thus keep Peyton off the field.

It could actually be that Meeks can run a better, more balanced defense with Fox's players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thunderraiden Veteran

thunderraiden

Posted
Posted

Meeks seem to do alright with the type of players that were here. His defenses were never this good in Indy, so maybe there is something to the way Fox and Hurney have built it. Input from Meeks sure, but why change what seems to be working already.

I have to go with Jangler on this one. Meeks put too much emphasis on Safetys and Defensive Ends in Indy. Also he sacrificed TOOO many other attributes in a player for speed. I think he would now have to realize we had a better formula here with out players. Can't wait to see healthy T. Davis and Beason behind healthy Defensive Line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kakarot Newbie

Kakarot

Posted
Posted

Yep, Im sticking and agreeing with team Jangler.

Meeks defenses were never this good. Towards the end of the year, we were even a bit better against the run. Somethings thats been a knock on Meeks in previous years at Indy.

Fox + Meeks= top 10 defense :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted

It's possible one of the reasons Fox looked to Meeks was that he believed with the offensive firepower or Williams, Stewart and Smith, we might be able to put up Menningesque scores and force other teams to play from behind the way the Colts did. Seeing how the offense looked in 2008, it wasn't so farfetched.

(still, admittedly, a bit of a stretch)

Obviously, with Delhomme's meltdown, it didn't play out that way this season. But as odd as it might sound, the overall effect on the defensive side might have been a positive (i.e. the building of a more balanced unit).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panthers55 Grand Master

panthers55

Posted
Posted

I suspect that we have most of the guys we will use next year already on the team. The DT spot seems loaded already. We have Kemo, Louis Leonard and Corvey Irvin all coming off IR this year. All three could project in our plans. With Tank Tyler and Damione Lewis, Nick Hayden and Derek Landri on the squad as well there hardly seems room for anyone else. We might even bring Thomas back to camp for one more encore giving us 8 altogether. The DE spots seems set if Peppers returns with Brown, Brayton, and Johnson filling the other spots. Taylor might be the odd man out and got little playing time last year. So we might bring in one or two more DEs if Pepper's leaves but otherwise I don't see the liklihood that much will change. We seem to have a good mix of speed and size so I doubt we make wholesale changes or bring in many guys in the offseason or through the draft.

Edit: So I guess that means I agree with Jangler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I suspect that we have most of the guys we will use next year already on the team. The DT spot seems loaded already. We have Kemo, Louis Leonard and Corvey Irvin all coming off IR this year. All three could project in our plans. With Tank Tyler and Damione Lewis, Nick Hayden and Derek Landri on the squad as well there hardly seems room for anyone else. We might even bring Thomas back to camp for one more encore giving us 8 altogether. The DE spots seems set if Peppers returns with Brown, Brayton, and Johnson filling the other spots. Taylor might be the odd man out and got little playing time last year. So we might bring in one or two more DEs if Pepper's leaves but otherwise I don't see the liklihood that much will change. We seem to have a good mix of speed and size so I doubt we make wholesale changes or bring in many guys in the offseason or through the draft.

Edit: So I guess that means I agree with Jangler.

Valid point.

So I'm seeing the general consensus is that Meeks will be the one adjusting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
csx Grand Master

csx

Posted
Posted

Knowing how DC Ron Meeks has operated in the past - with defenses made up predominantly of undersized, speedy guys - I have to wonder a bit what the offseason will look like on the defensive side of the ball.

I don't believe that's necessarily the case here since we acquired several DT after he's been here and they have all been average to heavy. (Leonard, Thomas, Tyler). I originally expected him to go after the undersized guys but he didn't. That approach was best for playing in the dome with a dynamic offense. Not here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Waldo
      Clowney released

      By Waldo · Posted

      Even limited as he was I still don't think they have replaced his production, and not just the sack stats. The games Clowney missed it was very obvious what his value still was. Risky move but whatever. They only had 32 sacks last year and if that drops then it's going to get ugly. I see the improvement in run stopping but not in pass protect in any way.  
    • pantherclaw
      Houston Texans... You Suck!!!

      By pantherclaw · Posted

      I have zero issues with this.  
    • MHS831
      Panthers start making cuts to roster

      By MHS831 · Posted

      Sorta related.  I just looked up a stat:  Success rates for NFL draft's second rounders.  I was surprised that it is 49%.  The success rate for first rounders is 58%.   Here success does not mean those that did not bust, it means that roughly half of the players selected in the second round become full-time starters at some point in their careers.  Busts do that too.  However, considering the fact that a first round talent is worth up to 1800 points (first overall pick) more than the first pick of the second round and as low as 350 points (last pick in first round) higher than the last pick in round 2, it seems there could be cases in which it would be to your advantage to trade out of round 1 and draft two or three second rounders for the value.  Of course, the elite players are likely to be gone, and some positions overwhelmingly suck after round 1 (traditionally, like QB or LT, for example), but if you need to find starters at positions like DT, G, LB, S, C, TE, RB, etc, there could be a time when you trade back for more starters.  I was surprised that the margin between rounds 1 and 2 was only 9%.    While I realize that some of you sofa scholars are thinking, "Well duh?  Trading back gives you more players." as you wipe the Cheetos off your shirt.  Not the point.  The point is you have to consider the draft,the needs (and the number of them), and you need to scout the second and third rounds like you do the first, the cap, and the long-term impact.  If you can find 2 players with a 49% chance of becoming a starter, are you better off than drafting one player who has a 58% chance in the long term? So if I traded away my first rounder for two second rounders (a trade most teams would make) regularly, when I got 10 second rounders (by trading 5 first rounders), 5 would be starters.  If I did not trade and kept my 5 first rounders, 3 would be starters.  Furthermore, their rookie contracts would be much cheaper than the 5 first rounders. 
×
×
  • Create New...