Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Defensive transition next season?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Here's a question born from discussion in another thread.

Knowing how DC Ron Meeks has operated in the past - with defenses made up predominantly of undersized, speedy guys - I have to wonder a bit what the offseason will look like on the defensive side of the ball.

Will we see the Panthers move to pick up more players that fit Meeks' previous MO, or will they continue with the kind of personnel that Fox has tended to prefer and ask Meeks to tailor his attack to the strengths of those players?

Which option is the best approach?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which option is the best approach? Or which option is most likely?

Honestly when you have a system in place that works, I'd like to see Meeks get more of "his" players. Unfortunately, I think it's always going to be the kinds of players Fox wants. So, I'm going to have to say that's probably a negative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meeks seem to do alright with the type of players that were here. His defenses were never this good in Indy, so maybe there is something to the way Fox and Hurney have built it. Input from Meeks sure, but why change what seems to be working already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which option is the best approach? Or which option is most likely?

Honestly when you have a system in place that works, I'd like to see Meeks get more of "his" players. Unfortunately, I think it's always going to be the kinds of players Fox wants. So, I'm going to have to say that's probably a negative.

Is that really a negative though?

Meeks' Indy defenses were built on the principle that teams would always be playing catch up against Peyton. Therefore they could tailor more to the pass than the run. That condition doesn't apply here. And unfortunately, teams found they could run on the Colts defense and thus keep Peyton off the field.

It could actually be that Meeks can run a better, more balanced defense with Fox's players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meeks seem to do alright with the type of players that were here. His defenses were never this good in Indy, so maybe there is something to the way Fox and Hurney have built it. Input from Meeks sure, but why change what seems to be working already.

I have to go with Jangler on this one. Meeks put too much emphasis on Safetys and Defensive Ends in Indy. Also he sacrificed TOOO many other attributes in a player for speed. I think he would now have to realize we had a better formula here with out players. Can't wait to see healthy T. Davis and Beason behind healthy Defensive Line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, Im sticking and agreeing with team Jangler.

Meeks defenses were never this good. Towards the end of the year, we were even a bit better against the run. Somethings thats been a knock on Meeks in previous years at Indy.

Fox + Meeks= top 10 defense :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's possible one of the reasons Fox looked to Meeks was that he believed with the offensive firepower or Williams, Stewart and Smith, we might be able to put up Menningesque scores and force other teams to play from behind the way the Colts did. Seeing how the offense looked in 2008, it wasn't so farfetched.

(still, admittedly, a bit of a stretch)

Obviously, with Delhomme's meltdown, it didn't play out that way this season. But as odd as it might sound, the overall effect on the defensive side might have been a positive (i.e. the building of a more balanced unit).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect that we have most of the guys we will use next year already on the team. The DT spot seems loaded already. We have Kemo, Louis Leonard and Corvey Irvin all coming off IR this year. All three could project in our plans. With Tank Tyler and Damione Lewis, Nick Hayden and Derek Landri on the squad as well there hardly seems room for anyone else. We might even bring Thomas back to camp for one more encore giving us 8 altogether. The DE spots seems set if Peppers returns with Brown, Brayton, and Johnson filling the other spots. Taylor might be the odd man out and got little playing time last year. So we might bring in one or two more DEs if Pepper's leaves but otherwise I don't see the liklihood that much will change. We seem to have a good mix of speed and size so I doubt we make wholesale changes or bring in many guys in the offseason or through the draft.

Edit: So I guess that means I agree with Jangler.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect that we have most of the guys we will use next year already on the team. The DT spot seems loaded already. We have Kemo, Louis Leonard and Corvey Irvin all coming off IR this year. All three could project in our plans. With Tank Tyler and Damione Lewis, Nick Hayden and Derek Landri on the squad as well there hardly seems room for anyone else. We might even bring Thomas back to camp for one more encore giving us 8 altogether. The DE spots seems set if Peppers returns with Brown, Brayton, and Johnson filling the other spots. Taylor might be the odd man out and got little playing time last year. So we might bring in one or two more DEs if Pepper's leaves but otherwise I don't see the liklihood that much will change. We seem to have a good mix of speed and size so I doubt we make wholesale changes or bring in many guys in the offseason or through the draft.

Edit: So I guess that means I agree with Jangler.

Valid point.

So I'm seeing the general consensus is that Meeks will be the one adjusting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Knowing how DC Ron Meeks has operated in the past - with defenses made up predominantly of undersized, speedy guys - I have to wonder a bit what the offseason will look like on the defensive side of the ball.

I don't believe that's necessarily the case here since we acquired several DT after he's been here and they have all been average to heavy. (Leonard, Thomas, Tyler). I originally expected him to go after the undersized guys but he didn't. That approach was best for playing in the dome with a dynamic offense. Not here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • These are the three deep throw attempts that Will Levis made in week 12. His first one is a beauty; Levis and Westbrook-Ikhine gets the safety to bite on a deep dig only to go over the top for the score. His second throw is another beauty: a crosser to Calvin Ridley reminiscent of Bryce to XL (though Ridley has noticeably more separation on his route). His third and final deep shot was an incompletion from his own endzone on 3rd & 14 with pressure coming down on him (to me, this seems like a solid throw).   Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-02.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro.mp4 Film Room Playlist NFL Pro-01.mp4 Levis took half of the deep shots that Young did. The differences are: Ridley had much better separation than XL, which is why his deep crosser turned into a 63yd play since he was able to scamper for another 15+ after the catch. Westbrook-Ikhine holds on to his TD pass. Bryce had to throw one away to preserve time for a field goal. Bryce had two more throws that were incomplete due to the WR Are we really holding the three WR errors and clock management decision against Bryce in order to say that Will was better throwing deep in week 12? That's not passing the eye test nor is it confirmed by the data.
    • If you go on the PUP list before the season starts, you are gone for the year. If you start the year on the PUP list then you can get off of it. Kind of semantics, but we are putting him on the PUP list now which is before week 1, that’s why people who come off of it aren’t really on the PUP list until week 1, hence you usually hear right before the season that they are “starting the year” on the PUP list. I think PUP list and IR may basically be the serve the same purpose now because you also sometimes hear that if a player is added to the IR before week 1 that they aren’t eligible to come off the IR list for the entire year. Now, everyone added to IR (post week 1) can come off after 4 (or more) games so the PUP list is meaningless since it’s 6 games and starts at week 1. Anyone added to PUP or IR in the preseason is gone for the year.
×
×
  • Create New...