Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

49er fans calling for wilks head!!


Sean Payton's Vicodin
 Share

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

There was word earlier that Shanahan had called Wilks into a meeting with some speculation that he might be fired, but I haven't heard anything further about that.

Going from being the next head coach in waiting to being fired from a coordinator spot midseason would be a hell of a fall from grace.

There is a report that SF traded with Washington to get Chase Young.  If so, that might be why he was called in.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SF only gave up a 3rd round pick for Young.  I have not watched the Commanders, but I thought Young was a strong edge rusher at least I know he was in his first few years.  I know he is in the final year of his rookie deal, but thought he would command more than a 3rd rounder.  if he plays well that defensive line will be nasty with him Bosa, Hargrave etc.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I find it interesting that people are talking about the SF defense.  With 7 turnovers in the last three games, might need to point the finger at the other side.  The reality is that most of the time, the more you turn the ball over, the more the other team scores.  

They are 16th in total pts allowed, 25th against the pass, 8th against the run, have allowed the 11th fewest pts, ARE tied for the most INTs, but are at the near bottom in Fumbles, and are 12th in sacks. They're no world beater this season. I only know this, because as mentioned, they are one of my Fantasy teams. They are the 15th ranked D by fantasy pts in the NFL right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/31/2023 at 8:31 PM, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

They are 16th in total pts allowed, 25th against the pass, 8th against the run, have allowed the 11th fewest pts, ARE tied for the most INTs, but are at the near bottom in Fumbles, and are 12th in sacks. They're no world beater this season. I only know this, because as mentioned, they are one of my Fantasy teams. They are the 15th ranked D by fantasy pts in the NFL right now.

They are fifth in points allowed per game.  

Reality is that without all the turnovers, they would likely be 7-1, or maybe 8-0.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • the problem is if we're waiting for Cam v2, we're going to be waiting decades longer.  our best hope is that bryce is better than we all think he is and that canales is able to work some serious magic with him and the scheme to help him live up anywhere close to the potential we thought he had. he's a smart kid. we just have to be able to have a situation that allows him to use his smarts.  the truth with cam was that een he had to have a system tailored for his skillset coming into the league. the difference between him and luck (which was the debate in '09 when we thought luck was an option) was that with luck, he could be placed in any offense and it would work...hence the higher floor he had  than cam. cam, though, needed an offense that was built around him to reach his potential. he could have done alright in a more pro-style offense, but to reach his ceiling (which was seen by a lot of people as being higher than luck). i don't think having to have an offense tailored around what you can and can't do well is a problem for people who can develop around them...after they've truly identified what those can and can't items are. we didn't have that last year. i think we have that this year. we want a guy who can carry a team on his back, but those kind of guys are very rare. we don't need to spend our time trying  find that guy, because even when you have them there's no guarantee that they will be enough.  championships are won, quite often, by teams who learn to compensate for less than the greatest QB play. you have a great defense and can protect the ball while wearing out the other defense and you've got a chance.  we don't need Bryce to be superman (despite where we drafted him and what we paid to get him). we just need him to be able to run (manage) a good offense. 
    • The Panthers aren't building a Bryce Young roster. Alabama didn't recruit personnel to fit a Bryce Young scheme. Canales' approach is to build an NFL roster (which they didn't have last season) and then cater his scheme and playcalling to what the players do best. The team is not pigeon holing itself into an offense that doesn't fit any other QB. Their goal this off-season was to provide NFL average or better talent to the offense - period. Very little to do with matching personnel for  Bryce Young's skillset or lack thereof.
    • lol the time lapse version of Panthers breakdowns
×
×
  • Create New...