Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Other NFL Week 8 Games


LinvilleGorge
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, UnluckyforSome said:

I have not understood their method of roster building for most of Blank's tenure. It's a oddly constructed team most years. Heinicke is a better option at qb, but he is still backup level. Maybe they spend their next high pick on another rb.

They actually have a decent roster for a rookie QB to step into unlike us.  Keep the coaching staff and draft one out of this class with Bijan, London, and Pitts for some nice weapons.  Of course I hope they don't do this and struggle for eternity because they are the Falcons.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sam Darnold will be the starting QB for the 49ers and he will keep that position for the rest of the season. 

 

Darnold has more arm talent than Purdy. I think the 49ers knew this which is why they felt comfortable trading Lance.

 

Mark my words Sam Darnold is going to make that team a legit threat to win the SB when he gets that starting job.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Sam Darnold will be the starting QB for the 49ers and he will keep that position for the rest of the season. 

 

Darnold has more arm talent than Purdy. I think the 49ers knew this which is why they felt comfortable trading Lance.

 

Mark my words Sam Darnold is going to make that team a legit threat to win the SB when he gets that starting job.

Sam, you are supposed to be paying attention to the game not posting here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

They actually have a decent roster for a rookie QB to step into unlike us.  Keep the coaching staff and draft one out of this class with Bijan, London, and Pitts for some nice weapons.  Of course I hope they don't do this and struggle for eternity because they are the Falcons.  

I think if you zoom out a bit you might see a bit more of what I am getting at. They've always put a premium on skill players, but then don't really have anything behind them or around them. Then for a few years towards the end of the Ryan era they really concentrated on oline, with some mixed results. They like splashy a whole bunch, and always have, but other than Michael Turner and a retiring Tony Gonzalez, I can't think of many deals they've made that worked out favorably, and unironically, those 2 were both on offense.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Sam, you are supposed to be paying attention to the game not posting here.

Sam with Steve Wilks and not much else on offense had us in position to make the playoffs.

 

What the hell do you think he's going to do with the 49ers roster?

 

Y'all sleeping on Darnold it has always been a roster issue. Dude simply played on bad rosters with bad coaches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Sam with Steve Wilks and not much else on offense had us in position to make the playoffs.

 

What the hell do you think he's going to do with the 49ers roster?

 

Y'all sleeping on Darnold it has always been a roster issue. Dude simply played on bad rosters with bad coaches.

You are literally out of your gourd.

Anyone who still believes in Darnold just literally has no idea what a good football player looks like.

Edited by kungfoodude
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We've never seen them outside of the structure of two very well ran organizations I'll give you that. And yes they are long in the tooth. I do think they are more than capable of getting a franchise turned around in short term capacity though. They are by no means a long term solution.
    • You're not making a good-faith argument by blaming literally everything on the quarterback when the defense gave him a fat 38 seconds to overcome its ineptitude, but it seems you're dead-set on blaming him for any problem the team encounters. In this case, it's not warranted. Sometimes it is. But he had no time to throw (pressured on 46% of all dropbacks, an insane amount) and that's simply not all his fault -- particularly when they rush 4 or less and are in the backfield in 1.5s or less. Should we have gotten more than 0 yards? Sure! But he hit a WR in the hands on fourth down and it was dropped. Not his fault. He missed one throw on second down but I attribute first down to a bad play call and third down to poor pass protection. I would've called some quick slants, personally, but it really seems you're saying: - playcalling: Bryce's fault - poor pass protection: Bryce's fault - defensive choking away a lead: Bryce's fault, not the defense - Horn dropping a pass: Bryce's fault It's a great way to garner support on here, because when it comes to Bryce, logic takes such a backseat to context that it's not even in the same vehicle. Plenty of games can be attributed to him. Can't take anyone seriously who solely blames him for that one. 
    • I don't see how you can logically make that argument when the team beat two of the top teams in the entire league during the regular season.  Now imagine the additional games we would have won against absolute tip top competitors like SF and SEA had we had a professional QB.  You can throw any random stat at the problem you want, but the proof is in the pudding.  We all watched it live.  This roster would have produced 13 wins (wins against SF and SEA, two wins against NO, and would have swept the Bucs) and (almost certainly) a #1 seed with a remotely competent QB.  Those were not games where we needed an all star performance to win.  Those were games where a very, very modest stat line would have netted us an easy win. Nearly every measurable aspect of the team would have been significantly improved with a competent QB.
×
×
  • Create New...