Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 Mock Drafts


pantherj
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Wait, are you wanting us to draft a TE or not?  (Kidding) I do like this draft. I mean Bortolini could be starting sooner vs later from round 5.

Only if the value is right and not before round 5.  I really only like two dudes, Wiley and Holker.   The draft would have to fall perfectly up to that point for us to take one.  I'm not sure Wiley lasts until round 5 though.  Holker is older and has limited upside, but is a natural pass catcher (something that our current TEs sorely lack).  We'd have to use a fifth rounder on him because he won't be there when we draft in the 7th.

I like one of the 5ths for IOL.  Centers are slow movers in the draft.  We can get a decent one there.  I think only like 7 centers get drafted each year on average. So in round 5 we'd probably be looking at Center4/5.  That would be in the Limmer/Nugent/Bortolini grouping.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

not sure how i feel about this one. didn't get a WR as early as i like to. 

reminds me of how things can go off the rails at any moment. i was lucky to get some trade offers that gave me more picks because it could have gotten ugly. i think we still got some good bases covered. only big question mark is the RB. Tyrone Tracy. Don't know much about him.

image.png.13f5f333e804d9297a4eb36ad8677f9f.png

 

I like this one a lot better, even with getting the WRs going later. I got my OL crew. I think McCormick, Gonclaves, and Zinter is now my goal in every mock. and a WR crew of Pearsall, Burton, and Washington would be awesome. I don't know that we add three and i seriously doubt they are around that long but it's nice to dream. 

image.png.bdf782e08ce236de6ccc1164d35aaab1.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

call it a day. i'm not a fan of the hype XL is getting and would be bummed if he's the pick at 33 or 39. i think he should be more in the 50 range, and would be ok with him at 65 if he's the second WR drafted

i personally would've grabbed Pearsall at 65, but get the feeling the panthers have a boner for XL (and it worries me)

PFN_Draft_result_1712071596508.thumb.png.1258fe826e1f56960034edb15e09aa8a.png

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...