Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mock Drafting!!!!

BeenPounding

By BeenPounding,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

jayboogieman Grand Master

jayboogieman

Posted
Posted
25 minutes ago, UnluckyforSome said:

It's well past time to get a TE that can make an impact on the field. Walls or Olsen are not walking through that door. No need to have another year of Ian Thomas's services.

Too bad the deep TE draft was last year, which Fitt ignored. Bowers is the prize of this year's TE crop and none of the rest are really close.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
recceice Proficient

recceice

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Too bad the deep TE draft was last year, which Fitt ignored. Bowers is the prize of this year's TE crop and none of the rest are really close.

Last year was the year to get a TE I agree but their are some intriguing kids in this class in mid rounds..

 

 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, UnluckyforSome said:

It's well past time to get a TE that can make an impact on the field. Walls or Olsen are not walking through that door. No need to have another year of Ian Thomas's services.

I would love to trade for Kyler Pitts from Atlanta. That kid is talented it just seems Atlanta has no idea how to use him or they simply don't care to get him a QB.

 

I wonder if we could get a trade done around Burns and Pitts.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthercougar68 Grand Master

Panthercougar68

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I would love to trade for Kyler Pitts from Atlanta. That kid is talented it just seems Atlanta has no idea how to use him or they simply don't care to get him a QB.

 

I wonder if we could get a trade done around Burns and Pitts.

I don’t know how Atlanta has kept it under wraps but apparently Pitts hasn’t been healthy all season with some kind of leg issue.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
recceice Proficient

recceice

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I would love to trade for Kyler Pitts from Atlanta. That kid is talented it just seems Atlanta has no idea how to use him or they simply don't care to get him a QB.

 

I wonder if we could get a trade done around Burns and Pitts.

Omg that sounds dumb.. Give them a young legit pass rusher for an already improved defense we have to face twice a year for a TE?? 
Did you actually put thought in that??

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CamWhoaaCam Grand Master

CamWhoaaCam

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, recceice said:

Omg that sounds dumb.. Give them a young legit pass rusher for an already improved defense we have to face twice a year for a TE?? 
Did you actually put thought in that??

Wait now all of a sudden Burns is a difference maker?

 

Then why not just keep him!

 

Y'all trash this man all season but when it's time to trade him within the division you get scared. 

 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
recceice Proficient

recceice

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Wait now all of a sudden Burns is a difference maker?

 

Then why not just keep him!

 

Y'all trash this man all season but when it's time to trade him within the division you get scared. 

 

 

Sorry I’m not a part of that fanbase.. Brian Burns is a 25 year old Pass rusher who has already achieved double digit sacks consistently… That’s not a common thing in this league and when you have that it is a good thing.. There is a reason ppl were offering 1st round picks for what he is now… And positional value must be a part of intelligent football decisions.. A TE isn’t as important as pass rush.. Atlanta is a consistent Pass rusher away from being a very strong defense why would we help them. Taking a less valued part that they can’t figure out how to use??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...