Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fans in Jax respond


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Bearzzz said:

Video is telling a story. The GM stood there without a reaction (seems scared of his boss). Tells you who is running everything in the organization (on and off the field). Owner probably gets to give his blessing on weekly game plan.

Are you suggesting the owner runs the organization? That's a serious accusation 😆 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People are missing the point. It’s not the seriousness of the action. I wouldn’t sue Tepper, I’d press charges. Don’t want a dime but Tepper will have a record. 

That would address the real problem and that is that people like Tepper think they’re immune to real word problems and consequences from their actions see: Tepper’s track record.

He won’t get anything serious, and it likely won’t bother people like Tepper, but he will have a blemish for all to see.

The problem is further exacerbated and point further proven when the average person would probably face consequences where as Tepper would not. That’s a much, much bigger problem to exemplify than just a drink thrown at someone.

We don’t need to condone being a shitty person as ok because of status. Just fuging awful for society.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, onmyown said:

People are missing the point. It’s not the seriousness of the action. I wouldn’t sue Tepper, I’d press charges. Don’t want a dime but Tepper will have a record. 

That would address the real problem and that is that people like Tepper think they’re immune to real word problems and consequences from their actions see: Tepper’s track record.

He won’t get anything serious, and it likely won’t bother people like Tepper, but he will have a blemish for all to see.

The problem is further exacerbated and point further proven when the average person would probably face consequences where as Tepper would not. That’s a much, much bigger problem to exemplify than just a drink thrown at someone.

We don’t need to condone being a shitty person as ok because of status. Just fuging awful for society.

That’s a lot of words for someone saying both parties are wrong

Edited by Panthercougar68
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Panthercougar68 said:

That’s a lot of words for someone saying both parties are wrong

Do you suggest charging people for talking? That makes zero sense. People talk poo all day long to everyone everywhere. People who don’t have self control to not take action are a bigger issue.

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...