Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You know who is eyeing that peppers money?


Zod

Recommended Posts

It's better to spread the money around to a group of excellent players than to put it all into the hands of one phenomenal, yet spotty, player who'd rather not be here.

I hate to see Pep go, but it was both his wish and for the betterment of the team long-term. Maybe we'll play against him in the Super Bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but is it enough to extend dwill, beason, and davis... and maybe stewart?

Yep. At least the The 21 million the tag surely could.

Let's see the Panthers get 3 great , significantly younger players and one soon to be great young player...maybe with a little change to spare.

for

1 great player...at 50%.

Anyone who says we should have tagged Peppers is a fuging complete idiot. He didn't want to play here. No one would have paid that and no matter how great a player thinking logically, getting rid of him will help this team as a whole far more than keeping him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah in the last thread where everyone was panicking i asked if they'd rather have peppers or a locked up beason, davis, kalil, marshall, and deangelo.

no one really said anything and just continued to eat paste

Besides money I like the way these guys you listed play football. The Panthers need the passion these guys bring and now that it will be their team they need to set the bar very high how each guy on the 53 man roster is expected to perform. Every game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be surprised if we do anything with Beason and Williams and might only tender Davis and Marshall. That way you save money in 2011 if there is a lockout. Seems Richardson is all about saving money.

Personally I think we should take the opportunity to extend some guys and give them a front loaded contract because there are no cap implications this year. That way when the cap is put back in place, we will take a much smaller hit rather than the other way around with backloaded contracts.

But then again it isn't my money so what do I know?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would be surprised if we do anything with Beason and Williams and might only tender Davis and Marshall. That way you save money in 2011 if there is a lockout. Seems Richardson is all about saving money.

Personally I think we should take the opportunity to extend some guys and give them a front loaded contract because there are no cap implications this year. That way when the cap is put back in place, we will take a much smaller hit rather than the other way around with backloaded contracts.

But then again it isn't my money so what do I know?

Why does everyone keep saying that JR is "all about saving money"?

They made one decision that Peppers was not worth $20M for one season or the probably ridculous amount he wanted for a long-term deal.

We may not play heavyin the big name FA signings. But, that is prob a good thing. This FA Class sucks and is very weak. When that happens, you overpay for mediocre players ....just becuase they are the best ones available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not saying it shouldn't be a part of his game it should be present yes. But expecting 500/10 in the rushing category is not sustainable IMO. All it's going to take is a defender to be willing to sacrifice a penalty or a fine to send a message just as the Falcons did with Sam Darnold. And even as big and durable as Cam was defenses eventually started to try to send a message to him too. We have to be realistic about not putting our QB at unnecessary risk. Especially given the fact we aren't even willing to run a QB sneak with him. We've also invested a good bit in our backfield that's what they're there for. And furthermore ultimately whatever QB  tier Bryce Young ends up landing in over the course of his career it is going to be defined by what he does as a passer not his rushing ability. That's all I'm saying.
    • Bryce had 191 yards 55% completion 1 td 1 pick.  That's an amazing performance?   Come on people
    • His footwork has been discussed many times over related to not just within the pocket but the quality of his drop backs and how while his receivers have been an issue his own footwork has created issues with his receivers. It is a mutual give and take dynamic after all. As far as his deep passing goes I will happily admit I saw some very impressive long throws from Bryce later in the season and I said so at the time and I'm still saying so now. That doesn't mean that there still aren't issues and beyond some instances of him flat out missing receivers deep that he knows he needs to get corrected I think there are still some throws to the sideline that defenses are going to test Bryce on early and often and until he can prove he can beat defenses on those throws consistently they will play him the same way. As far as talk of Bryce being top ten and the metrics that define that different people are going to have different answers and I've said before after the conclusion of the 2024 season that I'm going to try to put yardage aside in some cases and just focus on what Bryce is doing both between the 20's moving the ball and how our redzone scoring percentage is looking. The biggest thing I'm looking for this season is scoring points. Not just field goals. Touchdowns. If the offense is moving consistently and reaching the end zone more often than not and not squandering drives and settling for field goals then I am going to be content for the time being. I do not expect miracles this season. I expect development and competiveness on both sides of the ball but particularly the offensive given the investments we've made trending upward. And no blowout losses. I don't think that's an unreasonable ask do you agree? 🫡
×
×
  • Create New...