Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers closing in on hiring DAVE CANALES


Coheed
 Share

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Word was they were pretty high on Callahan before the Titans got him. Hence why I fear we panicked here.

It also comes off as a "bidding against ourselves" sort of thing since no one else was pursuing him. There was no need to rush...but we did.

I hope it works, but it might be one of those cases of "more lucky than good".

I think where I'm at is that all HC hires fall into a camp of "more lucky than good". You could have the most thorough process and still end up with a dud. The Falcons have interviewed 14 candidates; we'll see who they ultimately end up hiring, but just because they are being slower/"more deliberate" in their approach doesn't mean they'll get someone who's going have better odds of success than Canales will. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, UNCrules2187 said:

I think where I'm at is that all HC hires fall into a camp of "more lucky than good". You could have the most thorough process and still end up with a dud. The Falcons have interviewed 14 candidates; we'll see who they ultimately end up hiring, but just because they are being slower/"more deliberate" in their approach doesn't mean they'll get someone who's going have better odds of success than Canales will. 

Depends on the people doing the hiring.

The Steelers have been pretty good with that, which was one reason why I was hoping Tepper would consult with Kevin Colbert.

The Eagles have also been good at it lately, although they've also created a toxic environment that hinders the ones they hire.

Others, like us, don't really seem to have a whole lot of logic to the process. We're just hiring whoever impresses us in an interview.

Maybe they'll be good, maybe they won't.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Kentucky Panther said:

I like the hire already, but is this really true? Good stuff if so

 

https://us.londonspeakerbureau.com/speaker-profile/mike-forde/

https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2022/1/6/22869889/nfl-coaching-carousel-avoid-mistakes  _ Forde is basically the entire article.

Can't find the link for Sportsology and Shannhan/Lynch but you'll find it if you look hard enough, out there somewhere.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jamos14 said:

 

https://us.londonspeakerbureau.com/speaker-profile/mike-forde/

https://www.theringer.com/nfl/2022/1/6/22869889/nfl-coaching-carousel-avoid-mistakes  _ Forde is basically the entire article.

Can't find the link for Sportsology and Shannhan/Lynch but you'll find it if you look hard enough, out there somewhere.

 

 

 

And Brandt Tillis is also mentioned in this article with Forde in it. 

 

No surprise then that Tepper is looking to bring him on after KC season ends.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Honestly, the guy does a TON of good research. His videos are always high quality and his insight is always stellar.  This video however changed my mind...dramatically about the draft.  Anyone who's seen my opinions knows Im a all in BPA guy, HOWEVER, this kind of changed my mind...Im now a BPA...at position of value dictated by the board.  A lot of words to say, weighted average is important. We all all know that having a good qb on a rookie contract is important, but what about a good edge...or reciever...or tackle?  THOSE things make a different and this opened my eyes to that.  With that said, not that I think we SHOULD go receiver in the first, HOWEVER, IT DOES MAKE SENSE.  If you have good young recievers coming in on rookie contracts, then you have more to build the rest of the roster at a lower cost.  If we were a team loaded at Receiver then things would be different, however, we only truly have 2 reliable WRs, so would another Receiver be a bad pick...I actually dont think so now based on value going forward.  Its just something to consider for everyone.    
    • Yeah, it's fool's gold. Darnold always had the tools. He just needed a tram with an elite D, a top 5 WR, and a Super Bowl MVP RB to carry him so he wouldn't be asked to press where he becomes a turnover machine. Darnold settled in once he was in a situation where he could just be a very talented game manager. People try to tell themselves Bryce can do that without realizing that Darnold still forces the D to respect the throws he can make that the coaches would rather he not attempt where as Bryce simply doesn't have the physical ability to force that respect opening up other opportunities. Like Parcells said leading up to the draft that based on his physical tool set "he better walk on water". What he was politely trying to say is that Bryce simply doesn't have an NFL physical tool set.
    • Got home in time to see Halls goal in the 3rd. Saw replays of Staal and LeCuck dropping gloves on the faceoff loved that! Playoff Freddie entered the building  woo! Hope to see the full replay on Fandual.
×
×
  • Create New...