Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young’s Arm Strength


0kBoomer
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We've always banned folks who show up with politically overt usernames, avatars, and/or obviously driving a single posting agenda from the get go. He checked every box. The error we made was not banning him straight out of the gate. I'll take the blame for that.

Look man, you obviously don't care and double down on your authority, but just so you are aware your name comes up on the Panthers subreddit a good bit and how you have driven people away from the huddle for power trips. Just want to be sure you're aware of that perception as I really enjoy the huddle and want to see it have continued success. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jb2288 said:

Look man, you obviously don't care and double down on your authority, but just so you are aware your name comes up on the Panthers subreddit a good bit and how you have driven people away from the huddle for power trips. Just want to be sure you're aware of that perception as I really enjoy the huddle and want to see it have continued success. 

Trust me when I tell you that I don't care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

So why bother? This isn't reddit. We're not trying to be reddit. If reddit suits them better, great. Glad they found a place they like.

I think you're purposely missing the point here. Even in this thread (and it isn't the first one) huddlers kind of call you out on power tripping as a mod and you double down. It's whatever, but it drives people away from here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jb2288 said:

I think you're purposely missing the point here. Even in this thread (and it isn't the first one) huddlers kind of call you out on power tripping as a mod and you double down. It's whatever, but it drives people away from here. 

And that's fine. They can have their opinions. When we suck people bitch and moan. We've sucked for a long time now so there's a lot of bitching and moaning. We haven't really changed how we moderate this place the fanbase is just fuging pissed off and I get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

They engage others just as much if not more than they are engaged.

Furthermore the pro Young/against Stroud guys were extremely toxic in the lead up to and in the months that followed the draft. I didn't hear a peep out of you about that.

If I saw it I would have commented on it I'm sure. Just curious why so angry that's all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You can talk about practically anything you want in the TB. That's the whole purpose of it.

He wasn’t talking about anything political. He was talking to you about Bryce Young’s arm strength. Are we to take this to mean dissenting opinions on Bryce Young have to be made in the tinderbox?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

He wasn’t talking about anything political. He was talking to you about Bryce Young’s arm strength. Are we to take this to mean dissenting opinions on Bryce Young have to be made in the tinderbox?

I'm specifically talking about his username and av. We generally ban those obviously baiting types right off the bat before they get cooking.

We obviously allow a variety of opinions on Bryce and our other players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

He wasn’t talking about anything political. He was talking to you about Bryce Young’s arm strength. Are we to take this to mean dissenting opinions on Bryce Young have to be made in the tinderbox?

He was an alias who has been banned numerous times for outright trolling.  He is a one trick pony and that one trick is played out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm specifically talking about his username and av. We generally ban those obviously baiting types right off the bat before they get cooking.

We obviously allow a variety of opinions on Bryce and our other players.

As ridiculous as it is to say that specific username and avatar are ban worthy, which it is ridiculous, it’s even more ridiculous to expect us to believe his debate with you played no role. The only thing that changed from him not being banned, to being banned, was arguing with you. Would he have still been banned if he were agreeing with you and posting opinions you agreed with?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

He was an alias who has been banned numerous times for outright trolling.  He is a one trick pony and that one trick is played out

Who is it and why wouldn’t that be the first thing brought up when people are asking why he got banned? I was called an alt account last off season by somebody so it’s hard to just take your word for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...