Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Where the QBs will Land


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, CPF4LIFE said:

It would have lined up really well for Drake Maye to end up a panther if no stupid trades.

No chance we have a top 5 pick with Sam Darnold and CMC/Moore on the team. We would be NFC South Champs and a playoff birth. The division was that bad. You got Baker Mayfield out here looking like the 2nd coming of Phillip Rivers all because he played in a bad division.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

His stats look decent in 2022.  This year it looks like he was just tucking it and running a lot.  I mean it was Duke.  You can't get the Clemson QB a pass with surrounding talent and not the Duke guy lol.  Big difference in talent between those two schools.  Regardless they both are two good stories to watch this year.

You don't know much about Clemson if you say they had talent last year.  Their top receiver was hurt almost all year, and he isn't an NFL caliber guy anyway.  Their OLine was leaking like the Panthers - no joke. 

And Duke wasn't as bad as you say either - they were ranked part of the year and have multiple NFL prospects including on offence.  Trust me the talent difference was not that big on offense....Leonard looked night and day different - much much worse.

Edited by Stingray3030
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It really has been a perfect storm of how to completely fug up a football organization.

Crazy part is most of the moves that were made on paper I was good with them at the time - the Henderson and Darnold trades I was not happy with, but like last year's free agents?  I was excited to have Hurst, Sanders, Thielen, Chark, Bell.  60% of that was an absolute bust.  Same the previous years.  It is truly not luck that we have been so unsuccessful - statistically it is clearly our fault.  I hope this turns quickly.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I gotta think the Vikings and Giants are going to be two of the more aggressive teams angling for Daniels, Maye and/or McCarthy.  

Both staffs are going into year 3, have had a lingering QB situation, and need to make a move or they risk their seats warming up.  

The Broncos are in a tough spot and you love to see it.  Same goes for LVR.  

ATL is a bit different of a situation, the right QB, they could win the division.

PIT & NE are the wildcards

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

I gotta think the Vikings and Giants are going to be two of the more aggressive teams angling for Daniels, Maye and/or McCarthy.  

Both staffs are going into year 3, have had a lingering QB situation, and need to make a move or they risk their seats warming up.  

The Broncos are in a tough spot and you love to see it.  Same goes for LVR.  

ATL is a bit different of a situation, the right QB, they could win the division.

PIT & NE are the wildcards

 

Especially the Vikings - if they resign JJ they definitely need to save $$ on their QB for the next 4 years to be competitive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Stingray3030 said:

You don't know much about Clemson if you say they had talent last year.  Their top receiver was hurt almost all year, and he isn't an NFL caliber guy anyway.  Their OLine was leaking like the Panthers - no joke. 

And Duke wasn't as bad as you say either - they were ranked part of the year and have multiple NFL prospects including on offence.  Trust me the talent difference was not that big on offense....Leonard looked night and day different - much much worse.

The talent on Duke vs Clemson isn’t the same lol. Just check out the draft…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

The talent on Duke vs Clemson isn’t the same lol. Just check out the draft…

Good grief man....you literally just proved my point.  Who exactly is in the draft from Clemson's offense?  Shipley (who got demoted to backup during the year and was oft injured) will probably get drafted Day 3....only other offensive guy is Putnam who is currently ranked outside of the draft.  We are only talking about defense.  Clemson hasn't had an NFL caliber WR since Trevor's Sophomore year.  2024 will likely be different.  Duke has a 1st round OT.

Edited by Stingray3030
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Stingray3030 said:

You don't know much about Clemson if you say they had talent last year.  Their top receiver was hurt almost all year, and he isn't an NFL caliber guy anyway.  Their OLine was leaking like the Panthers - no joke. 

And Duke wasn't as bad as you say either - they were ranked part of the year and have multiple NFL prospects including on offence.  Trust me the talent difference was not that big on offense....Leonard looked night and day different - much much worse.

Bruh.  

Clemson has an absurd roster vs the rest of the ACC.....it just hasn't had the QB play paired with young WRs.  That's the only reason they have lost games the last 3 years.  To say Clemson doesn't have talent is just not knowing Clemson.  That roster top to bottom is built different than everyone else in the ACC.   If they managed to get just average ACC level QB play the last several years.....they would have remained in the college playoff because their roster ain't built like other ACC programs. 

Clemson's D is straight-up loaded with talent.  They have 5 players from the D alone going in this year's draft.  7 total. ....and those dudes don't even represent the best players from last year's D.  Heck if Carter opted not to go back to Clemson, they would have had 2 first rounders from that D in this draft class. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Bruh.  

Clemson has an absurd roster vs the rest of the ACC.....it just hasn't had the QB play paired with young WRs.  That's the only reason they have lost games the last 3 years.  To say Clemson doesn't have talent is just not knowing Clemson.  That roster top to bottom is built different than everyone else in the ACC.   If they managed to get just average ACC level QB play the last several years.....they would have remained in the college playoff because their roster ain't built like other ACC programs. 

Clemson's D is straight-up loaded with talent.  They have 5 players from the D alone going in this year's draft.  7 total. ....and those dudes don't even represent the best players from last year's D.  Heck if Carter opted not to go back to Clemson, they would have had 2 first rounders from that D in this draft class. 

Will you stop trying to argue things I never say?  You do it all the time to everyone man - come on dude that is just pathetic and annoying to everyone here.  I have yet to argue Clemson's OVERALL talent.  I said their OFFENSIVE TALENT IN 2024 specifically.  I know Clemson better than most and obviously you if you don't see that....I live here...we discuss it daily during the season with dozens of people who know even more than me.  No one said defense and no one said any year other than 2024.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Stingray3030 said:

Good grief man....you literally just proved my point.  Who exactly is in the draft from Clemson's offense?  Shipley (who got demoted to backup during the year and was oft injured) will probably get drafted Day 3....only other offensive guy is Putnam who is currently ranked outside of the draft.  We are only talking about defense.  Clemson hasn't had an NFL caliber WR since Trevor's Sophomore year.  2024 will likely be different.  Duke has a 1st round OT.

Clemson's biggest problem at WR is health and the inability to keep guys on the field to develop.   And of course, QB play factors there. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Stingray3030 said:

You don't know much about Clemson if you say they had talent last year.  Their top receiver was hurt almost all year, and he isn't an NFL caliber guy anyway.  Their OLine was leaking like the Panthers - no joke. 

And Duke wasn't as bad as you say either - they were ranked part of the year and have multiple NFL prospects including on offence.  Trust me the talent difference was not that big on offense....Leonard looked night and day different - much much worse.

Oh stop. This is that same bullshit folks cooked up to convince themselves that Bryce was carrying inferior talent at fuging Alabama. Clemson is a blue chip blue blood college football program these days. Look at the recruiting class rankings year over year. They're stacked with talent. Do they have down years? Sure. But their "down years" would be pretty good years for most programs. That's just the reality of the college football landscape where the rosters are gigantic and there's plenty of scholarships to go around. The blue chip programs gobble up a crazy amount of talent every year. People who think the transfer portal are going to fix this are probably mistaken. Sure, that 5* WR who is 4th or 5th on Clemson's depth chart might transfer to UNC and be #1 or #2 on their depth chart but at the same time that 2* kid who went to say Marshall and blossomed into one of the best receivers in college football then transfers to Clemson. The rich still get richer but maybe it helps lift up the poor somewhat. I don't know, we'll have to see how it all plays out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A winning record would be nice, but I still have us winning around the 6 to 8 game mark. Realistically we should beat the Jets and Saints, that gets us to 5 wins. After that, we have to face a lot of potential play off teams and our divisional opponents. I think we’ll win 1 or 2 of those games to take us to 6 or 7 wins, perhaps 8 wins if we can spring a further surprise.  Is that enough progress for head coach and QB? I’m not sure, it will depend on performances and output. That said, it’s nice to be back in a position where we are thinking about the play offs.
    • I would tend to agree about not falling into the trap and paying a below average QB, but sometimes situations can “force” a team to pay that QB. For example, if we play ourselves into a 9-8 like record, then what options will we have in the draft? Or do we avoid the draft and trade for or sign someone in free agency?  I’m not convinced by the 2026 QB draft class. There’s some intriguing prospects but no one that really screams “draft me”. I’m not sure we’ve got anyone really that stands out as a trade candidate or free agent signing. So although we might not want to commit a big money contract to Young, him playing well and showing progress might force the team’s hand. 
    • Realistically we would be looking at no more than a mid round pick for Dowdle or Chuba. Are we really that desperate for a mid round pick? Not really. I would much prefer us utilise the two RBs in a 1-2 punch similar to how we used D-Will and Stewart. After all, Bryce is not Drew Brees. He won’t throw for 300+ yards and carry the team consistently as a passer. So having a strong running game with a 1-2 punch will be beneficial to him, and it will also be beneficial to the RBs because we can spell them and not overwork them.
×
×
  • Create New...