Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers cut Bradley Bozeman


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Itty, bitty cap savings, little purchasing power in FA due to Burns and only six draft picks, yet we are creating more holes.   I get the roster needs a make over, but if we keep cutting able bodied guys at even fringe starter quality and absorbing 99% of their cap hit just to be anywhere but here, then we are tanking.  There's no question about it.  What a fugged up year to tank.

Lol at the PSL holders who got their ticket prices jacked up to watch the 2024 tank show.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Itty, bitty cap savings, little purchasing power in FA due to Burns and only six draft picks, yet we are creating more holes.   I get the roster needs a make over, but if we keep cutting able bodied guys at even fringe starter quality and absorbing 99% of their cap hit just to be anywhere but here, then we are tanking.  There's no question about it.  What a fugged up year to tank.

Lol at the PSL holders who got their ticket prices jacked up to watch the 2024 tank show.

I get the scheme fit but you create a hole that has to be filled, you don't save cap space and possibly you end up creating a "reach" need in the draft.

It just seems like a very Panthers way to handle it.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

#Teppmagic

One thing this does prove is while Fitterer and Morgan worked side by side and are still friends to this day, they don't necessarily approach building a NFL roster the same way.  Morgan is already cleaning up some of Fitterer's past moves even though we have limited resources to plug new players into those holes. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 45catfan said:

One thing this does prove is while Fitterer and Morgan worked side by side and are still friends to this day, they don't necessarily approach building a NFL roster the same way.  Morgan is already cleaning up some of Fitterer's past moves even though we have limited resources to plug new players into those holes. 

One hopes it is a shared vision with the new coach. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

that doesnt make sense, the cut I mean

It makes me think Morgan basically said, 'cut your contract or be cut.'  Making some dudes an example.  If the Ian Thomas "restructure" ends up being essentially a salary cut, then Morgan's message has been sent to the rest of the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

It makes me think Morgan basically said, 'cut your contract or be cut.'  Making some dudes an example.  If the Ian Thomas "restructure" ends up being essentially a salary cut, then Morgan's message has been sent to the rest of the team.

Or the new coach evaluating and basically saying, "Hey, I can't use this guy."

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

It makes me think Morgan basically said, 'cut your contract or be cut.'  Making some dudes an example.  If the Ian Thomas "restructure" ends up being essentially a salary cut, then Morgan's message has been sent to the rest of the team.

that doesnt make sense as he still gets paid, would be a weird way to try and alpha someone but I guess we will see once the details of thomas comes out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Wide zone sucks. Reich and Canales both looked at the only success we had running the ball with Wilks and both were like nah lets do the opposite whimpy ass wide zone scheme

Our implementation of it and players used for it sucks.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Helllllllllllllll no on Tyreek, not even on a vet minimum and if he was playing at his peak abilities. We have way too young of a WR room to bring that head case into the locker room, there is just no way I want him around any of our WRs.  The things that make him great aren't things that can be taught, they're his natural born athletic gifts, so there isn't anything useful he can teach our guys and would just be a bad influence on them. Same goes for Stefon Diggs. Allen I'd love, he'd be a great mentor for T-Mac and Coker, but I doubt he plays anywhere other than with the Chargers or a legit true SB contender this year (and only small odds on the latter there, likely Chargers or nothing I'd guess).
    • On the new site if you don't have access to your old email I have the solution.    You will be give a chance to recover your account.   The site will ask you for your username and your old email.    If those entries match what is in the huddle database, you will be given the opportunity to input a new email address to reset your password with. You can then login and change your profile however you want.  If those entries don't match, it will be ignored.  This seems like a very simple solution. Once everyone is happy and migrated over we will remove the tool. 
    • a lot of folks online saying "who?" I just keep replying, the guy who outplayed Puka Nacua in back to back games on national tv, that guy. 
×
×
  • Create New...