Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

BREAKING: Giants looking to trade for Brian Burns


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, La Pantera said:

Compensation isn’t great. Probably the most we could squeeze out. But freeing up money is a bonus. On top of that we could add a couple mid tier guys for less money to cover the production.

I don't think any mid-tier guys are coming to Carolina unless you pay them top-tier money.

Why would they? Oh, here's my shot at improving my career. Let me just go down to Carolina where the owner is a known fool, the GM is a tool, and the coach is an unknown. Sure, you won't have anyone around you that's talented, so it may get a starting roster spot. But will that really help your career when the team wins 0-4 games each season?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

They were never going to get a 1st for him.

Just like nobody was going to pay him $30 million a year?

That contract alone says we should have got a 1st for him

To me, this more screams this front office is trying to look for the quick fix and they were only going to trade Burns for an asset in this year's draft, but trading him for a 1st next season would have been the smart move as we're not 1 offseason away from fixing this franchise, it's a multi year thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just love how all the networks are calling Brian Burns, an all world, terrorizing defensive end. Have they watched the last couple seasons of him? lol. Plus, the huddle has constantly bitched about his lack of production and hustle the last couple seasons, but now that he’s gone everybody is crying the fuging blues. Lol damn if you do damn if you don’t I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Krovvy said:

I don't think any mid-tier guys are coming to Carolina unless you pay them top-tier money.

Why would they? Oh, here's my shot at improving my career. Let me just go down to Carolina where the owner is a known fool, the GM is a tool, and the coach is an unknown. Sure, you won't have anyone around you that's talented, so it may get a starting roster spot. But will that really help your career when the team wins 0-4 games each season?

We’ll see I guess. There are several guys out there who could put up decent sack numbers who won’t demand a quarter of $150 mill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys are suffering from serious recency bias and group think.

The league can see that Burns is still talented. A down year, on a train wreck of team that's been yanking him around with trades and contract negotiations. No poo he didn't produce on a team that almost never had a lead in a game.

If Burns is even mediocre good then his contract is worth it. I don't know how to explain this to some of y'all but pass-rushers are a premium position, that you need to get to a Super Bowl. I cannot think of team that made it there that didn't have a pass-rush.

I mean, hell, just use your brains and tell me what years the Panthers were at their best, and then tell me what their pass-rush looked like. Having JAGs and late round picks playing defensive end means you're not a winning team.

Here's to all the 2nd round defensive end busts the Panthers have drafted.

Drunk That 70S Show GIF by Peacock

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, La Pantera said:

We’ll see I guess. There are several guys out there who could put up decent sack numbers who won’t demand a quarter of $150 mill

Really, name them. I want to see if you're correct and they come to Carolina for anything short of a massive overpay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

Really, name them. I want to see if you're correct and they come to Carolina for anything short of a massive overpay.

Barret, Clowney, Lawson, Hunter, Floyd, Smith… and more.  Replacing 10 sacks isn’t difficult.  We didn’t lose a 15+ sacks a season or anything 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, La Pantera said:

Barret, Clowney, Lawson, Hunter, Floyd, Smith… and more.  Replacing 10 sacks isn’t difficult.  We didn’t lose a 15+ sacks a season or anything 

Okay, give me the numbers. This is going to blow your mind.

Anyone coming to the Panthers will have to be massively overpaid, or a reclamation project.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Just like nobody was going to pay him $30 million a year?

That contract alone says we should have got a 1st for him

To me, this more screams this front office is trying to look for the quick fix and they were only going to trade Burns for an asset in this year's draft, but trading him for a 1st next season would have been the smart move as we're not 1 offseason away from fixing this franchise, it's a multi year thing.

What he got paid doesn't mean he's worth it.  Another team was not going to pay him what he wanted AND give up a 1st to do it. That was never going to happen.  I hope the Giants get their money's worth out of him. We certainly didn't get ours.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

Okay, give me the numbers. This is going to blow your mind.

Anyone coming to the Panthers will have to be massively overpaid, or a reclamation project.

Gave you names . Not doing goddamn math for you… none of those guys are getting more than a couple year contracts. 
 

guess we’ll just have to see how it plays out.

 

edit: Huff got 50 mill( 1/3 Burns money) over 3 years. Most of those guys will be under that 

Edited by La Pantera
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sometimes wonder what a team would look like with:

Baker Mayfield

Christian McCaffery

DJ Moore

Brian Burns

Derrick Brown

Jaycee Horne

Jeremy Chinn

Vonn Bell

Frankie Luvuu

Ikem Okwonu

Taylor Moton

And then I remember, that’s when we SUCKED, and now we’re many years from getting to that level.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...