Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anyone know which DEs we are still entertaining?


Recommended Posts

Just now, Jackie Lee said:

Luckily edge is probably the most plug and play position on defense, I think draft then waiver wire is the way to go looking at the current fa options. Let DJ Johnson and Barno get a ton of work in camp to see if they are developing into anything decent

Plug and Play from a playbook perspective, yes. Not from a physicality standpoint, otherwise I'd say fug it, just draft some guys. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Panthero said:

Plug and Play from a playbook perspective, yes. Not from a physicality standpoint, otherwise I'd say fug it, just draft some guys. 

I mean whoever gets cut in camp and is on the waiver wire will be in shape. Sometimes they get cut not because they're bad but because a rookie stepped up in camp and they need the roster spot somewhere else. Pretty sure there will be someone better than K'Lavon Chaisson on the waiver wire at some point

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Panthero said:

Plug and Play from a playbook perspective, yes. Not from a physicality standpoint, otherwise I'd say fug it, just draft some guys. 

Do both.  Draft and waiver wire cuts.  Let’s not overpay for one year rentals.  That’s what got us in this dumpster fire.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, bythenbrs said:

Do both.  Draft and waiver wire cuts.  Let’s not overpay for one year rentals.  That’s what got us in this dumpster fire.

I hadn't considered the waiver wire option--that could certainly work, but depending on the draft for a starter will be a disaster. I'm not asking for a 15 mil a year contract, just a guy to allow DJ and whoever we draft time to come along. If we'll pay for Jewell, why not a DE? I don't understand that logic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Panthero said:

If we'll pay for Jewell, why not a DE? I don't understand that logic. 

I have no problem with Jewell or similar Edge on a cap friendly contract.  Just don’t sign a ‘name’ like Clowney with a high salary expectations.  We need to be shopping at the bargain bin until we can build a real, legitimate roster of draft picks and young players on first contracts.  ‘Value’ signings are fine.  

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, bythenbrs said:

I have no problem with Jewell or similar Edge on a cap friendly contract.  Just don’t sign a ‘name’ like Clowney with a high salary expectations.  We need to be shopping at the bargain bin until we can build a real, legitimate roster of draft picks and young players on first contracts.  ‘Value’ signings are fine.  

Agree completely. I think Clowny would be a mistake. Jewell and Wonnum are around 6 mil per. I was thinking that range would be fine. I prefer cheaper but I don't think that's too steep. I'd come off 10 for the right guy (under 28, willing to be here 3 years, etc.)

Edited by Panthero
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Just to be clear (because I do the same thing) you are referring to edge or the 3-4 rush OLB, correct?  To me, there is nothing there, short of overpaying Clowney.  I know Clowney had a good season last year, but he was on a winning team with a lot of support.  Here, he would not have as much support and he would not win as much.  I am afraid we'd be paying for performance in Baltimore and not Carolina. 

We now have Wonnum on the Strong side and he is mediocre.  We have an interesting choice in Chaisson on the Rush Edge side and he was out of position before--maybe he will return to first round pick status here.  I am cautiously optimistic.  We have Barno who played well at times and I think would improve in year 3.  Beyond that,  Johnson has underwhelmed and Leota has been below average, but he was an underafted rookie. 

I hope this is not seen as an attempt to derail your thread.  It is a good topic on its own.  I simply think the option to finding a free agent starter is to develop what you have and draft a player.  I have been researching this when you posted this, so I thought I'd share where my mind is right now:

If you look long term and at the cap, considering we are likely not going to make the playoffs, use the year to draft and develop an edge. Develop Chaisson (first round talent) and Barno, two players who have skills but lack technique, to overly simplify.

In the draft, I like the following players (note that not all players on the list are 3-4 rush OLBs like Burns was--that is what we need):

1. Chop Robinson (he could fall to the Panthers, but it is highly unlikely. pick #33)

2.  Bralen Trice (pick #65 if available) Was slow 4.72 40 but his college productivity shows 7 sacks and nearly 50 tackles.  To me, that suggests he has the potential to be effective vs the run and get pressure on the QB)

3.  Jonah Ellis (pick 65) Productive in college with 12 sacks, but his 3 passes defended suggests that he is in the face of the QB quite a bit.  I see him as a rotational player in the NFL, not a starter.

4. Austiin Booker (pick 65) He is my favorite and a value for the third round.  56 tackles and 8 sacks w/ 2 forced fumbles. He, like Bralen Trice, ran a slowish 4.79 40 but they had as many tackles as the top 3-4 OLBs and they had as many sacks, on average.

NOTE:  I like 2 others, but they played opposite studs.  Chris Braswell has a great motor but his physical makeup is questionable for an elite edge. I would seriously consider him at #39--based on the "Dawg" factor alone.  He played opposite Dallas Turner, so how many sacks were due to protecting the other side or pressure forcing the QB into Braswell's lap?  Braswell ran a 4.6 if that matters.

Adisa Isaac played opposite Chop Robinson, and he too has a high motor.He ran a 4.74 at the combine, so I have to think that the 40 times for Booker, Trice, and Isaac are based on 40 times--which means very little. It does measure, however, the takeoff and release. 

So I guess my point?  If you are building a program, develop some youth at $2m per season as opposed to paying a journeyman $8m for a rental season.

image.thumb.png.1f0dfb5562bcd55d4be8dc284a0bf2b1.png

Nice work. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Panthero said:

Agree completely. I think Clowny would be a mistake. Jewell and Wonnum are around 6 mil per. I was thinking that range would be fine. I prefer cheaper but I don't think that's too steep. I'd come off 10 for the right guy (under 28, willing to be here 3 years, etc.)

Clowney made 4.7 m will bonuses last year. He's not likely as expensive as everyone is thinking.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MHS831 said:

Jonah Ellis is going to be the steal of the draft--even if we take him at #33.  Under the radar.

Yeah not the best edge class but there’s a few (him included) that could be great. Elliss would slide right into a Jack role for us. His spin move is Freeney-esque

Then there’s Kneeland who is a straight up bully. Can set the edge, bull rush, throw OTs backwards. He also surprised with the best 3-cone and short shuttle. So he’s sneaky quick. 

I believe both of those guys are way high on team boards over certain website rankings.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Yeah not the best edge class but there’s a few (him included) that could be great. Elliss would slide right into a Jack role for us. His spin move is Freeney-esque

Then there’s Kneeland who is a straight up bully. Can set the edge, bull rush, throw OTs backwards. He also surprised with the best 3-cone and short shuttle. So he’s sneaky quick. 

I believe both of those guys are way high on team boards over certain website rankings.

Good to know, the mock draft sims are depressing for the edge 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not bad, not great. Talk to me after the season. There's too much disfunction to make an accurate call.
    • One of the few positives is we are at least giving significant reps to our young players. Of course there's really no one else anyways.
    • We've played 6 games, so about 35% of the season has passed already. I know it's early but this class already looks more promising than 2023, which might have been the worst draft in panthers franchise history.  Legette looks pretty good, he looks explosive. Maybe he hasn't gotten huge bombs yet but he's demonstrated that he's strong and fast with the ball and is a nice red zone target. He's probably gonna get something like 500 yards 5 or 6 TDs by seasons end, which is pretty decent for a rookie WR on a bad team.  He's basically what the Panthers thought Mingo would be last year.  Brooks obviously hasn't played but he could turn this rookie class into a slam dunk if he's good. I'd expect him to get sprinkled in to the later half of the year, but don't expect him to get a ton of carries with Chubba running so well and Canales apparent aversion for running the ball. Wallace has been a pleasant surprise. I haven't been watching him super closely, but I like his tackling ability and high motor. JT Sanders has been okay ish.   Not so sure about Smith Wade or Crumedy. I know Barrett was traded to Seattle.  We very very rarely hit on 4th  to 7th rounders historically.  So even getting a solid role player out of any of these dudes would be a huge win.  
×
×
  • Create New...