Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Round 1 Game 2 Canes vs Isles 7:30pm


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Nah that isn’t close to it. They needed an enforcer on 1, I love to Jarvy but you ain’t no enforcer. 
 

There was considerable breakdown after the 4 on 4 was called. We didn’t rise to match the islanders.

We need to play our game, not theirs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s the same poo every year. Teams gap up at the line, we dump it in and can’t get to it, rinse and repeat.

Someone has to be able to carry the puck into the zone ffs.

And it doesn’t work in the playoffs because teams are much more conservative. There’s no room out there.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

It’s the same poo every year. Teams gap up at the line, we dump it in and can’t get to it, rinse and repeat.

Someone has to be able to carry the puck into the zone ffs.

And it doesn’t work in the playoffs because teams are much more conservative. There’s no room out there.

We were playing fine til 4 on 4. Bad break by Freddie and burns. They knew that was gonna be a weak spot from game 1… 

Aho needs to chill his poo out and they need to put TT on 1. 1 is not dynamic right now. 

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

We were playing fine til 4 on 4. Bad break by Freddie and burns. They knew that was gonna be a weak spot from game 1… 

Aho needs to chill his poo out and they need to put TT on 1. 1 is not dynamic right now. 

TT with Aho and Guentzel? FFS, go back to the hottest line in the league the past month. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

We were playing fine til 4 on 4. Bad break by Freddie and burns. They knew that was gonna be a weak spot from game 1… 

Aho needs to chill his poo out and they need to put TT on 1. 1 is not dynamic right now. 

I wouldn’t even say we were playing fine… KK was playing fine, that’s it.

Shot totals don’t always correlate to good team play. We aren’t getting high danger chances and we can’t even skate the puck into the zone on the PP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MillionDollarCam said:

I wouldn’t even say we were playing fine… KK was playing fine, that’s it.

Shot totals don’t always correlate to good team play. We aren’t getting high danger chances and we can’t even skate the puck into the zone on the PP.

Everyone but 1 was playing fine. 1 is an issue right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
    • Jones got projected as the next Eli because they share a similar goofball, on the spectrum energy.  That's my theory.
    • I didn't think underrated was the wildest statement. The passing and offensive command he showed in week 18 against Atlanta was as good as any QB that has ever played for this franchise.  I mean THAT part is wild.  Which plays into the overrated part.  End of regulation I don't think he even hit 200 yards passing.  I mean he had a very efficient day vs a weak defense.   As good as we have ever seen in Carolina?   
×
×
  • Create New...