Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 Draft: Day 3 (Rounds 4-7)


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, WhoKnows said:

If you don’t care so much, why do bother watching the draft and come in the threads? You’re acting like I don’t know that a team has its own ranking. It’s ok to disagree and think we passed on guys that we shouldn’t have. I actually enjoy the draft and I’ve got a great memory so I’ll remember the guys we passed over and check in to see if they pop up as successful or not.

Also, I’ll be honest and maybe you will agree and maybe you won’t, but I think this team has royally fuged up by going for their needs instead of BPA. Miami is a playoff team and even after they took an edge in the 1st, they saw value in another edge in the 5th that they didn’t have in for a visit. I don’t think we’ve done that at all which leads to missing on solid players like Tre Smith a couple drafts ago. I think that our going for needs has been because our GMs have thought we were close even as our 2013-2017 playoff teams were basically whittled away. It has absolutely contributed to us going from 4 out of 5 playoffs to a 2-15 team that was lucky to barely win both games. I liked some of the picks today and hope they do well, but the way we finished up was reminiscent of the past 6 drafts. We’ll see but I’ll remember Limmer, Jones, McLahlan and Kamara to see if we might have had one of those mega drafts that we so sorely needed. Adios and you enjoy as well.

So I'm not allowed to watch it and discuss it unless I'm obsessed with it? Got it. I think I will stick around anyway. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TD alt said:

Hell, man, I've seen enough UDFAs over the years here that I'm not about to believe any one of them is going to be significant. Philly was as good as it ever got, and I had to argue with people about his status as JAG. Remember KeyGarrett and that other tall dude whose name I can't even remember (I think it started with Mc). LOL 

Norwell? Addison? Remmers? We had 3 starters and one solid contributor (might be forgetting others) on that 2015 team that were UDFAs.

UDFAs can be valuable. We just have done nothing with them in Hurney 2.0 and Fitt. We did a lot with them before that. Hurney 2.0 was mining the XFL of all things. I’ll never get that over college UDFAs.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WhoKnows said:

Norwell? Addison? Remmers? We had 3 starters and one solid contributor (might be forgetting others) on that 2015 team that were UDFAs.

UDFAs can be valuable. We just have done nothing with them in Hurney 2.0 and Fitt. We did a lot with them before that. Hurney 2.0 was mining the XFL of all things. I’ll never get that over college UDFAs.

I could have been more clear. I'm specifically talking receivers. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jon Snow said:

So I'm not allowed to watch it and discuss it unless I'm obsessed with it? Got it. I think I will stick around anyway. 

You can do whatever you want. Let’s be honest, you were the one telling me how to act and what I seemingly didn’t know. I’ve always liked the draft even with as poo as we’ve been the part 6 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WhoKnows said:

Norwell? Addison? Remmers? We had 3 starters and one solid contributor (might be forgetting others) on that 2015 team that were UDFAs.

UDFAs can be valuable. We just have done nothing with them in Hurney 2.0 and Fitt. We did a lot with them before that. Hurney 2.0 was mining the XFL of all things. I’ll never get that over college UDFAs.

Thielen? We didn’t get him originally but udfa’s can be good. And underdawgs

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WhoKnows said:

You can do whatever you want. Let’s be honest, you were the one telling me how to act and what I seemingly didn’t know. I’ve always liked the draft even with as poo as we’ve been the part 6 years. 

I'm just telling you how it works. What you do with that information is up to you. You can always ignore it if you think it's useless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...