Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Rags Round 2 Game 2 Tuesday 7PM


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

He’s also a year older now and appears to have matured in net. The key is giving the boys energy and putting a chip on Freddie’s shoulder.
 

If we are giving up goals again early Rod has to go to Pyotr.  I know you don’t put all the goals on Freddie, but it’s the playoffs. It’s the goaltenders job to bail their defense out on at least one of them. He didn’t on all of them. 

I'd actually agree if Freddie puts us down 2 I'd swap

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

Well guys I lied apparently. Rod just Freddie in net and no lineup changes. That mean no JAG. 

I mean like he’s gonna announce a change. Lav isn’t either. Only thing I believe is that there are no players sitting or coming in and that Freddie is starting. 

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GamecockSmitty4 said:

Not excited to watch Freddie again tonight. Coming back from 2-0 will be almost impossible against this team if we lose. Also, someone please lay into Trouba. 

I hear ya, but two years ago we were up 2-0 on the Rangers and they won game 7.  Last year the Rags were up 2-0 on the Devils we played NJ in the 2nd round.  I think we can still make a go of the series if we lose tonight, but I want to see Hurricanes hockey tonight.  We do that, and I think we'll be just fine. 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, TheCandyMan said:

I hear ya, but two years ago we were up 2-0 on the Rangers and they won game 7.  Last year the Rags were up 2-0 on the Devils we played NJ in the 2nd round.  I think we can still make a go of the series if we lose tonight, but I want to see Hurricanes hockey tonight.  We do that, and I think we'll be just fine. 

This tonight to me is for control of the series.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, TheCandyMan said:

I hear ya, but two years ago we were up 2-0 on the Rangers and they won game 7.  Last year the Rags were up 2-0 on the Devils we played NJ in the 2nd round.  I think we can still make a go of the series if we lose tonight, but I want to see Hurricanes hockey tonight.  We do that, and I think we'll be just fine. 

I get it I just think this Rangers team is really good, even though I hate them. It would also take elite goalie play to take 4 of 5 which we haven’t seen to this point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Today, we are all Kucci... I miss our feral Russian attack goalie!
    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
×
×
  • Create New...