Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

RUMORS: Panthers schedule leak


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Butterflyj30 said:

 

“30 seasons”…..somehow the last half decade under Tepper couldn’t even get a clip in lol.  Should have named the video the Richardson Panthers. 
 

all Panther PR just rubs me the wrong way under Tepper.  Bless the folks who have to make lemonade out of tomatoes. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, CRA said:

“30 seasons”…..somehow the last half decade under Tepper couldn’t even get a clip in lol.  Should have named the video the Richardson Panthers. 
 

all Panther PR just rubs me the wrong way under Tepper.  Bless the folks who have to make lemonade out of tomatoes. 

I totally agree!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, CRA said:

“30 seasons”…..somehow the last half decade under Tepper couldn’t even get a clip in lol.  Should have named the video the Richardson Panthers. 
 

all Panther PR just rubs me the wrong way under Tepper.  Bless the folks who have to make lemonade out of tomatoes. 

Only BY content I've found all year is Bojangles pr

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jackie Lee said:

Only BY content I've found all year is Bojangles pr

 

They giving Bryce the Matt Rhule treatment (going into year 3)…..where they tried to highlight everyone but the HC.  It just stands out and has the reverse effect.   

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

They giving Bryce the Matt Rhule treatment (going into year 3)…..where they tried to highlight everyone but the HC.  It just stands out and has the reverse effect.   

Yeah putting all their eggs in the XL basket it appears

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah putting all their eggs in the XL basket it appears

XL is fun.  I think they should market him heavily.  Fun accent.  Unable to keep a smile off his face.   Just a likable human.  A lab built WR in terms of tools.   That seems like a smart play right now.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

XL is fun.  I think they should market him heavily.  Fun accent.  Unable to keep a smile off his face.   Just a likable human.  A lab built WR in terms of tools.   That seems like a smart play right now.  

Yeah they tried with CMC when there was no QB play/personality but with the politician speak and injuries it didn't really translate to the media side. If XL actually balls out it'll be a good move, and it'll be genuine on his part

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First off, my memory is faulty and so I should remember you. Anyways, welcome back. Having been around here since 2004/2005, I do have to say all these hot takes are not necessary new. I still very much remember all the constant complaints about Jake Delhomme. How he was too inaccurate, fumbled the ball too often, threw bad interceptions, and how Steve Smith deserved a better QB. How this franchise needed to replace Jake for someone better because he dragged everyone down. We even had names for Jake defenders; Blind Delhomme Jock Sniffers (BDJS). That one thread about Chris Weinke over Jake Delhomme because Weinke threw for 423 Yards but only scoring 13 points remains the worst hot takes I've ever seen around here. So to me, it feels like history repeating itself again and I don't feel like getting that much involved in flame wars like I used to. I am more of a sit back and see what the players/team does type of person. And even then, yes, there are so many moving parts that it's not as easy to pinpoint the core issues, especially when you're not inside the building and know every single detail.  And yes, I think even way back then, I hated how overvalued the QB position was and it hasn't gotten much better. It's to where my philosophy has shifted to where if you can't win a SB with a QB on their rookie contract, you might as well get another one. Otherwise, you have to give that QB so much money that the rest of the roster suffers and your window becomes quite narrow.  That's why I'm skeptical that Mahomes/Burrow/Jackson/Allen will win more than one or two SB's between them. None of them look as invisible as they did a few years ago and that's because their targets are much inferior and/or they are getting more roughed up behind a worse O-line.
    • Haha I was still off was thinking of mac jones he has done extremely well this year with basically no weopons as all the 49ers are hurt except for mcaffrey but he is playing slow this year for some reason. 
×
×
  • Create New...