Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brandon Aiyuk trade


 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm honestly not for trading away significant assets until we're confident that we have QB solved.

I think you would know really fast if he is with that level of talent. Best case, it’s takes Bryce over the edge and he becomes good. Worst case, he still stinks and the next qb has talented WRs to come okay for. It’s a win win for now and the future. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Panthers Fan 69 said:

I think you would know really fast if he is with that level of talent. Best case, it’s takes Bryce over the edge and he becomes good. Worst case, he still stinks and the next qb has talented WRs to come okay for. It’s a win win for now and the future. 

You still have to acquire that next QB in the worst case scenario. That's why I'm for conserving future assets. We might need them to get that QB. If you don't have a QB you don't have a shot. Can Bryce be Brock Purdy in the perfect scenario? Maybe. But Brock Purdy will turn into a liability once the Niners have to pay him. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You still have to acquire that next QB in the worst case scenario. That's why I'm for conserving future assets. We might need them to get that QB. If you don't have a QB you don't have a shot. Can Bryce be Brock Purdy in the perfect scenario? Maybe. But Brock Purdy will turn into a liability once the Niners have to pay him. 

and we cannot afford him

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Sure we could. You can always get creative with contract structure.

I think the # he wants is $30 mil per.  thats a lot to move around as it stands right now and like you say if we give away more draft assets that pretty much ties us to Bryce for the foreseeable future and I doubt anyone wants to do that without seeing 2024

 

Plus I seriously doubt san fran wants to trade him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I think the # he wants is $30 mil per.  thats a lot to move around as it stands right now and like you say if we give away more draft assets that pretty much ties us to Bryce for the foreseeable future and I doubt anyone wants to do that without seeing 2024

 

Plus I seriously doubt san fran wants to trade him

Trading for him would likely cost next year's first and if BY doesn't perform, that's going to be a top 2 pick. I'd rather draft an elite WR and pay far less if that's the option we have to go. 

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SmokinwithWilly said:

Trading for him would likely cost next year's first and if BY doesn't perform, that's going to be a top 2 pick. I'd rather draft an elite WR and pay far less if that's the option we have to go. 

This would be the only way I wouldn’t do it. But for a couple 2nd rounders. Sure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am gonna believe it wasn’t us if the 4th round pick price is accurate. We needed 225 points to get from 19 to their pick. 875 at 19 to 1100 at 14.  Our 2026 4th was valued at 56 points I think. A future 4th has less value. So that wasn’t close to enough.    It would have taken our third and our fourth. Comes within a point of even.    Now, moving to their spot in the second round we could have done but after Miami took Rodriguez why would we? 
    • Yep,and Blake Miller have had more experiences than Freeling,Lions did not sigh a vet T like Walker,so they had to pick Miller.
    • I mean it's expected.  This is the NBA.  And they hate the Charlotte Hornets.  Flagg was also the guy "magically" given to the Mavs who lost Luca to the wildly popular Lakers.  Was always an uphill battle.  But the award is BS since it's not voted on before play-in starts. Kon probably lost because of the play-in as many people switched votes.  It was a regular season award, so this is some nonsense.  Kon also didn't have the luxury of taking 10 games off to rest up injuries like Flagg did.  If he did, he wouldn't have been nursing his back the last month.  I mean, screw him for being on an actual playoff team that matters.  Flagg took tons of shots a game, he was wildly inefficient.  Kon was a huge reason the Hornets made the play-in and turned the season around after Jan.   I think Flagg will probably be the better player long term, or at least the most impact.  But Kon should have won ROTY.
×
×
  • Create New...