Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Russell Okung on Dave Canales:

thunderraiden

By thunderraiden,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Davidson Deac II Grand Master

Davidson Deac II

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, csx said:

Everyone is trying to get a great qb. If it was easy they wouldn't be called Suoermen.

Brady and Mahomes are 7 of the last 10. Brady was Superman? Huh?

Brady (and fwiw, most great qb's) was at his best under pressure.  He didn't get rattled, and was probably more accurate than earlier in the game.  IMO, that is what separates the adequate guys from the all time greats. In that regard, he was a Superman.   Same with Mahomes and Montana.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Aussie Tank Grand Master

Aussie Tank

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Brady (and fwiw, most great qb's) was at his best under pressure.  He didn't get rattled, and was probably more accurate than earlier in the game.  IMO, that is what separates the adequate guys from the all time greats. In that regard, he was a Superman.   Same with Mahomes and Montana.  

 

Was Brady dropped into the worst coached side in football with the worst oline and weapons? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PootieNunu Grand Master

PootieNunu

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, rayzor said:

i'd just like to say that winning a superbowl is an anomaly for any QB not named Tom Brady or Patrick Mahomes. 

there is no QB prototype that consistently wins championships.

QB doesn't win championships.

Winner goes to teams that can do their damn job and that's usually teams that are coached better.

Joe Montana as well...

Qbs definitely win championships

The 49ers clearly had the better team, yet the chiefs still won just this past season.

Yes there are some 1 off guys but most super bowl winners have had great QBs. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Micah officially requests a trade

      By TD alt · Posted

      I heard one analyst say that Parsons is (or was relative to the same age) a better player than Mack. Could be recency bias, but I'd say that that's absolutely true.
    • Proudiddy
      Micah officially requests a trade

      By Proudiddy · Posted

      Watson is a cautionary tale because he pulled that trade coming off a full year he didn’t play due to injury and then almost a whole other full season due to an 11 game suspension for being a creep.  If Parsons was coming off all of that, I’d agree - we don’t do it.  But Parsons has been mentioned with the likes of LT and Mack.  If we could swing it, we should do it.  I don’t think the cowboys would trade him in-conference, but we’ve seen wilder things happen before (McRib to WSH).
    • Proudiddy
      Micah officially requests a trade

      By Proudiddy · Posted

      Saw a post somewhere earlier that said what the Bears gave up for Khalil Mack would be a fair comp as to what to expect it would take to get Parsons.  But Parsons is actually a year younger than Mack was at that point, and also, I believe Mack was named an all-pro at two different positions that prior year, iirc…  but I think Parsons is as equally versatile. we should definitely see what it would cost, at minimum.
×
×
  • Create New...