Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Downey Jr cast as Dr Doom


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

Quote

Like Thanos himself, Robert Downey Jr.'s return to the Marvel Cinematic Universe may have been inevitable. But few expected it would go down like this.

On Saturday, Marvel revealed at the pop-culture convention Comic-Con that Downey is coming back to the franchise in the upcoming movie "Avengers: Doomsday" (2026), which will be followed by "Avengers: Secret Wars" (2027). But rather than reviving Tony Stark/Iron Man, he's taking on a new role as one of Marvel's most iconic villains: Doctor Doom.

Source

To me this reeks of desperation on Disney's part because the phase 4, or whatever phase was the most recent, movies and shows didn't make the money they hoped they would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, jayboogieman said:

Source

To me this reeks of desperation on Disney's part because the phase 4, or whatever phase was the most recent, movies and shows didn't make the money they hoped they would.

(this might be wrong, I'm not totally versed/invested in the entire Avengers storyline)

They're leveraging the multiverse arc present in the new Deadpool movie and hinted at in Loki (and has a full comic book series about) where one (actor) might represent different characters.

it works to explain why there are different Peter Parker actors, or how Captain America is played by the same actor as in the old Fantastic 4 movie. Or multiple Hulks

So it's not Tony Stark that we've known as Dr Doom, but it's that universe's Tony Stark who is Dr Doom and not Iron Man

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, PanthersATL said:

(this might be wrong, I'm not totally versed/invested in the entire Avengers storyline)

They're leveraging the multiverse arc present in the new Deadpool movie and hinted at in Loki (and has a full comic book series about) where one (actor) might represent different characters.

it works to explain why there are different Peter Parker actors, or how Captain America is played by the same actor as in the old Fantastic 4 movie. Or multiple Hulks

So it's not Tony Stark that we've known as Dr Doom, but it's that universe's Tony Stark who is Dr Doom and not Iron Man

I get that, but I hate the whole multiverse nonsense. And I always have. It was always just an excuse for the comics to have multiple versions of the same characters running at the same time to make more money. The multiverse makes even less sense for the films since they're not making different movies of different versions of the same characters. Disney Marvel is just using the multiverse to bring back popular actors. Plus, it means death and heroic sacrifice means nothing because they can just bring them back as a "different" version.

What's even worse is that Disney wanted to move away from the original avengers cast because they wanted to move onto a younger, more diverse, and most importantly cheaper bunch of actors. But since the last phase mostly disappointed, it's time to see if bringing back a popular actor and his character can re-spark the magic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

 they're not making different movies of different versions of the same characters. Disney Marvel is just using the multiverse to bring back popular actors.

Spiderman would like to have a word.... 

 

25 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Disney wanted to move away from the original avengers cast because they wanted to move onto a younger, more diverse, and most importantly cheaper bunch of actors. 

the stories I'm reading from 2023 suggests a larger view. I wouldn't call Pedro Pascal or some of the others significantly younger and/or entirely cheaper (although, compared to RDJ's paycheck, almost anybody is cheaper)

https://ew.com/fantastic-four-cast-pedro-pascal-reed-richards-8567528 

But comic books plot lines change constantly. How may Superman or Batman movies have we had with different actors playing the main roles? #TeamKeaton

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PanthersATL said:

Spiderman would like to have a word

I had forgotten about that movie. It could be argued that movie proves both sides of the argument.

1 hour ago, PanthersATL said:

the stories I'm reading from 2023 suggests a larger view

I'm not sure if they really have a long term view. They shelved the Kang stuff quickly after the actor got in trouble. But all they had to do was recast the role.

1 hour ago, PanthersATL said:

I wouldn't call Pedro Pascal or some of the others significantly younger and/or entirely cheaper

Had to look up that he's been cast in a marvel movie after your post. He doesn't fit the Mr Fantastic role to me. Age and he doesn't seem tall/skinny enough. But since there's never been a good live action Fantastic Four movie, I'm not holding my breath his will be any different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After Avengers End Game, most of the newer marvel movies failed because of poor choices surrounding new/replacement superheroes. The ones that didn't were movies with heroes kept from the early Marvel phases. e.g. Guardians, Dr. Strange, Spider-man, Thor.

A lot of the new heroes are with female leads. I don't have an issue with female leads (I like Captain Marvel), but some were poor choices. Some examples: Boseman died and they could of used the multi-verse to bring in Killmonger as Black Panther. Then you have Ms. Marvel which was a flop. Then there's Iron Heart which was another lame character.

Eternals was also a flop (mixed cast, but nobody cares about these guys).

What they should of done: Give the fans what they want. Cast the right people for the right roles and stop appearing to try to push an agenda.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they rushed when they needed to take 4-5 years after Endgame and plan out what to do next. They planned it all that summer. That's what money will do unfortunately.

Its fine, the MCU from Iron Man to Endgame was extremely good and thats a good set of movies to always revisit (besides Thor Dark World - ew)

The new MCU is just too much multiverse content, which cheapens emotions because now you don't really care what happens to the characters. They are brought back almost immediately if they die. IMO they should have skipped the multiverse stuff entirely, or just kept it contained in the Loki series and tie it in a bow that way.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, amcoolio said:

The new MCU is just too much multiverse content, which cheapens emotions because now you don't really care what happens to the characters.

One thousand times this.

 

The multiverse and the Quantum Realm were neat tricks in Endgame.  Its a tired trope in the new MCU.  Im not invested in any of the characters when they all have the ultimate plot armor.

Edited by Cullenator
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

used to watch marvel stuff religiously but now I just wait for it to come to disney plus and even then it's a maybe for me. The quality has just dropped so hard after endgame. Rushed products to meet yearly deadlines. 

I almost think they just need to reset the entire universe and start with fantastic four and x men. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm firmly in my desire for Matt Reeves Bat-verse continuation and having a proper DC universe set in the tone of the comics in the last 20 years. Serious with characters having personality that break that darkness and lighten it in moments. Not cheaply done like in The Flash but done with some care.

Marvel jumped the shark and seem to be floundering trying to get their bearings. As stated, nobody gives a damn about the characters anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right now, XL is probably outside the top 100 NFL WR's. That is just not going to cut it.  He certainly could turn it around but our track record in this area is very well established. When our WR's bust, boy do they bust. XL looks exactly like so many of those cases.  XL has been the 9th most productive WR in that 2024 class and is likely to slip to 10th very soon as one of the guys who missed a large chunk of last season is about to pass him(Pearsall) in career production. That's not great for the 7th overall WR picked. It's a disappointment, without question. Even a the guy getting healthy scratches has still outperformed him so far.  And, for the record, it was a very, very productive WR class so far.
    • 4th read? On a playaction? Do you not watch the ALL 22? There were 4 receivers on that play. Only 2 went beyond 2 yards on a 10 yard crossing route in front of a single high safety. The TE stayed in to block before releasing on a drag route and was never a read. Coker was motioned to the right to pull a defender to the sideline. This was a clear flat route and hot if the defender came on a blitz. The RB stayed in to block on the right side. Coming out of the playaction Bryce spots the defender for a possible blitz and then goes to his primary receiver on his left. The only receiver on the left coming out of the playaction was TMac. He clearly follows TMac to the cross in front of the safety and looks off the safety to the left. This is not a read to XL. It's looking off the safety. He swings his vision back to his primary in TMac and throws the ball to the numbers (20) 10 yards over the head of the DB when TMac reaches the right hashes near the 30 yard line before TMac even makes a cut. Bryce was never leading or throwing to the receiver. He was throwing to a spot based on the movement of 2 defenders. It was up to TMac to make this play happen with perfect timing, release, sell and cut on his route. Give credit to the play design. The defense is playing that route as a sideline route and TMac makes it happen with his body position and control as he cuts/drifts 10 yards up field to the spot he knew it was going to before the play. If that were a 4th progression read out of a playaction, you'd see 4 hitch steps and the receiver would have been led to the sideline as TMac would have never known the ball was going to be thrown 10 yards over the DBs head on a 10 yard cross to the sideline. You can also tell this is the desgin as Bryce sets to the left out of the playaction with XL on his right before the cross. Then he takes 3 bounce steps to move with the pocket as XL is late to the cross. His first hitch step is to the right after TMac crosses, which is followed by an immediate throw before a cut is made by TMac. TMac was the only receiver to the left on Bryce's set, and he was one of 2 WRs to the right on Bryce's first and only hitch step. Give TMac and the play design a bulk of the credit. Bryce did well, but he didn't sell the playaction or a possible pass to XL very well. He did do very well at throwing to a predetermined spot on the field after TMac set up that crossing route perfectly with XL and Sanders both late on developing their routes. Did you catch all that on the play? For some reason, you think there were 4 progressions out of play action with the defense pressing, Bryce setting his hips to the left with all 3 receivers on the right side of what you think was his 4th option as the only receiver on the left at the snap, and only 1 hitch step to the right after TMac waits for XL to cross left. Why would you think a QB would set their hips to the left when their first 3 progressions are on the right side of the field?
    • Agreed, however there are many QBs that don't place it perfectly.  
×
×
  • Create New...