Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Practice August 14th


Icege
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Icege said:

Realists don't engage in fortune telling.

You think he is better than Stroud? How real is that?

Imma fortune tell the hell out of something for you right now and we will see: some Bryce stan makes a hater comment towards Bryce critics, and the skeptics will be blamed for being haters when they counter.

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Wut?

People like to call themselves "realists" only to turn around and make proclamations about the future based on their beliefs/feelings. For example, a person that claims to be a realist only to then turn around and say that a player will never be good are engaging in fortune telling (which is a form of cognitive distortion).

ie: "Steve Smith will never be a good WR because he's too short" is fortune telling. An example of a realistic approach would be: "Steve Smith will have to make up for his lack of height by working on his route running in order to create separation and be open for his QB."

Edited by Icege
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, strato said:

You think he is better than Stroud? How real is that?

Imma fortune tell the hell out of something for you right now and we will see: some Bryce stan makes a hater comment towards Bryce critics, and the skeptics will be blamed for being haters when they counter.

I've got no problem with people trying to predict the future.

I'd just rather they stop gaslighting themselves and others by proclaiming it to be reality when it isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Icege said:

I've got no problem with people trying to predict the future.

I'd just rather they stop gaslighting themselves and others by proclaiming it to be reality when it isn't.

Nobody that wanted to draft Young gaslighted themselves, right? Man I am LMAO at that one.

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Icege said:

People like to call themselves "realists" only to turn around and make proclamations about the future based on their beliefs/feelings. For example, a person that claims to be a realist only to then turn around and say that a player will never be good are engaging in fortune telling (which is a form of cognitive distortion).

ie: "Steve Smith will never be a good WR because he's too short" is fortune telling. An example of a realistic approach would be: "Steve Smith will have to make up for his lack of height by working on his route running in order to create separation and be open for his QB."

It's not a prediction when we have data to back it up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...