Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Most overrated QBs as voted by their peers


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

That's an expensive September

It's going to be fun watching him have to do more with less as the years go by in that contract, with a 63.4 cap hit in year 3 is my guess when it turns on him. That's why they let Hunt walk and signed their guys to 1 year deals at both OG spots. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Waldo said:

New model will be build the hell out of your team and use QBs on rookie deals. I would not want to be a Dolphins fan right now. 

Edited by strato
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, strato said:

New model will be build the hell out of your team and use QBs on rookie deals. I would not want to be a Dolphins fan right now. 

That's not new.  People have been trying to do that since Seattle won over a decade ago.

The reality is, it's not a feasible strategy.  If you have a legit QB, they aren't seeing that 5th year option.  They will be extended on a new deal by year 3 or 4.  The model is get a franchise QB that can compete for titles, which is insanely difficult.

You have to make the call if they are that guy or not by year 3.  We'll see how this works out for Miami.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

That's not new.  People have been trying to do that since Seattle won over a decade ago.

The reality is, it's not a feasible strategy.  If you have a legit QB, they aren't seeing that 5th year option.  They will be extended on a new deal by year 3 or 4.  The model is get a franchise QB that can compete for titles, which is insanely difficult.

You have to make the call if they are that guy or not by year 3.  We'll see how this works out for Miami.

I should have said instead of signing an iffy player to a big money deal given to a real bona fide guy, it is better to draft another. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, strato said:

New model will be build the hell out of your team and use QBs on rookie deals. I would not want to be a Dolphins fan right now. 

Never pay a QB a 2nd contract that can't make a SB run with less around him IMO. Tua isn't worth half that contract and they weren't contenders last year with him on the end of his rookie deal. Miami was written off before the playoffs even began.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Admiral Ackbar said:

So basically even NFL players cant recognize the difference between the good and bad QBs from a distance.

Why the heck do fans feel they know any better....

Right? Fans having opinions? What's that all about? Who do they think they are?

It's almost like anyone can have an opinion and be wrong sometimes because we all have flaws and make mistakes.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, NAS said:

1) Josh Allen
2) Jalen Hurts
T2) Tua Tagovailoa
3) Justin Herbert
4) Trevor Lawrence
5) Deshaun Watson 
6) Kyler Murray 
T6) Brock Purdy

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/41001234/nfl-patrick-mahomes-lamar-jackson-caleb-williams-quarterbacks-ranking

 

Trying to see the logic behind the list...

1) Josh Allen - Has yet to reach a SB. For all the big plays he makes, he's also a turnover machine which has cost his team games.
2) Jalen Hurts - Eagles in general fell off a cliff for drama that - afaik - hasn't been fully revealed yet. Maybe he's part of that drama and/or he's hit a developmental wall.
T2) Tua Tagovailoa - Team carrying him more than the other way around. Overpaid.
3) Justin Herbert - All the talk about him being an elite player doesn't line up with overall record, even after considering circumstances.
4) Trevor Lawrence - See Justin Herbert
5) Deshaun Watson - Scandal + Paid an unjustified amount of money
6) Kyler Murray - Possible poor work ethic. Excuses made for erratic performances.
T6) Brock Purdy - See Tua

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, frankw said:

Right? Fans having opinions? What's that all about? Who do they think they are?

It's almost like anyone can have an opinion and be wrong sometimes because we all have flaws and make mistakes.

Triggered much??

It's not about having opinions, its about thinking your opinions are fact...everyone is guessing at the end of the day.

Edited by Admiral Ackbar
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Admiral Ackbar said:

Triggered much??

It's not about having opinions, its about thinking your opinions are fact...everyone is guessing at the end of the day.

No sir. Just commenting on and trying to bring some humor to a strange POV that I've seen lately here about fans remarking on sports matters in general as if they have no place doing so. To which naturally the only conclusion to make is why would a place like this even need to exist then?

If that's not what you intended then apologies and no harm no foul.

On the bolded I think you've accurately described the majority of sports media. Which includes many former players across different sports doing the same thing. Of course fans and content creators on social media mimic these behaviors. At this point it is what it is.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...