Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, csx said:

I have Clemson diehard friends. They weren't expecting anything here. Certainly not shocking the world.

Dabo is a drain on that program

Dabo is the only reason that program is relevant.

Unfortunately now that everyone can pay players he's lost his fastball. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OldhamA said:

Dabo is the only reason that program is relevant.

Unfortunately now that everyone can pay players he's lost his fastball. 

true,  UGA, Bama, Texas, Michigan, and everyone else finally has a level playing field with Clemson and can now start paying folks the big money Dabo was doing.   Because that was clearly the secret sauce in Clemson lol.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

Depends.  I guess if Clemson is only the 2nd half team vs the #1 team in the nation they can’t beat State.   

But maybe State is really more that first half team that couldn’t handle Western Carolina if we just pick and choose a half 

 

You have to admit, in the first game of the year, youd much rather look good in the second half than vice versa. Dabo did Clemson no favors by playing scared. Who knows how momentum swings if goes on that 1st 4th n 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, SmittysLawnGuy said:

You have to admit, in the first game of the year, youd much rather look good in the second half than vice versa. Dabo did Clemson no favors by playing scared. Who knows how momentum swings if goes on that 1st 4th n 1.

It was over at half time.  Dabo played too conservative and wasted it all while the D played as good as it gets vs UGA.  That was the window.  The first half.  Mafah is a fine RB but you can’t run him vs UGA like you would a Duke.  Gameplan was never about winning IMO. 

for all the talk of Garrett Riley, his O (playcall and design)…..has been trash at Clemson.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

It was over at half time.  Dabo played too conservative and wasted it all while the D played as good as it gets vs UGA.  That was the window.  The first half.  

for all the talk of Garrett Riley, his O (playcall and design)…..has been trash at Clemson.  

I wonder if he is getting green lighted. Looks more Dabo style. If that game is tied at half or within 3, that second half never happens. They were deflated cause coach had no faith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Just tell them that the score didn't matter today.

I think I’m okay.  I think I can pull of the SC “win” vs Old Dominion was just as embarrassing as our loss.   

Old Dominion gave away that game.  Took two fumbles inside their own 10 for SC to be able to beat them and have any offense.  Think Clemson’s O is going to look like a juggernaut vs South Carolina. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...