Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, CRA said:

What do you mean how so? Back to back weeks in ACC play the game has come down to a play late under review….that the masses all see as the review being handled wrong and in Miami’s favor to thus get the win. 

now you can argue refs get plays wrong all game.  They do.  But once it goes to review? That’s viewed differen.  There wasn’t the evidence to overturn that TD under review last week and that should have been targeting called this week. 

so yeah, if the call the majority of football fans think should of been made during review was…..Miami is 0-2

 

I'm confused.

The late review on a Hail Mary where it clearly wasn't a catch? As in the 'masses' agreed that 'yeah it probably wasn't a catch, but you it'd be funny if it was so let's get irate?'

As for the targeting call - I thought if a review took over 5 minutes to make the the call on the field should stand?

Make your mind up, love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OldhamA said:

I'm confused.

The late review on a Hail Mary where it clearly wasn't a catch? As in the 'masses' agreed that 'yeah it probably wasn't a catch, but you it'd be funny if it was so let's get irate?'

As for the targeting call - I thought if a review took over 5 minutes to make the the call on the field should stand?

Make your mind up, love.

No one is irritate.  That’s what people say when they want to get off the real topic  Review is review.  You have to have the evidence to overturn it.  The masses agreed the undisputable evidence didn’t exist that was required vs VT. 

that was targeting.  Maybe you give them a pass for botching it if it wasn’t under review.  But you can’t not call it targeting under review.  Doesn’t matter the time they took. It was clear cut under review.  Targeting. 

which is why even during the game dealing ESPN was talking about these back to back late game reviews where the refs were getting it wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

You're not wrong but this is rich as hell coming from a Clemson fan. LOL

 

I’ve always conceded when Clemson got good they started getting calls.  At least you could argue they earned their way into that tier of team that gets them.  

In this new era, it sure looks like the powers that be a trying to create a good team In the ACC

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

I’ve always conceded when Clemson got good they started getting calls.  At least you could argue they earned their way into that tier of team that gets them.  

In this new era, it sure looks like the powers that be a trying to create a good team In the ACC

The ACC has always protected the hell out of their best bets at getting a playoff team. I was thinking the expansion to 12 teams may lessen their perceived need to do that but I guess not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The ACC has always protected the hell out of their best bets at getting a playoff team. I was thinking the expansion to 12 teams may lessen their perceived need to do that but I guess not.

Miami was nuts. Then after the targeting botch…..they ignore 2 OL down into the endzone on the final TD.  Not one but two illegal men downfield. 

Miami fans pretending what has been going on isn’t fishy is funny as hell.  

Miami through 2 games has proven they ain’t good enough for the ACC to be trying to help them out.  They have not played  a single good game yet.   ACC folks too desperate to create something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've already addressed this notion in a previous reply. You are basing your assertion outside reality if you think Bryce would have not only been more successful but defeated the Patriots in place of Herbert. Bryce got blown off the field by that Patriots team with the highest paid OL in the league. We've seen Bryce with an OL that gave up 65 sacks and it resulted in the #1 pick. And that is not a defense of Herbert or arguing he is a great QB in any way. He has physical talent but he has been similar to Darnold early in his career in terms of his very up and down perfomances. However that does not change the fact that they have significantly less invested in the OL than the Panthers.
    • I think Tepper has been setting the stage where pending there is no miracle he wipes it all clean.  Think you already have been told that with small things like Evero staying.  Bryce is the guy next year.  OC, DC, everything stays the same.  QB room largely the same.  Nothing would really matter there.  They basically get one more shot and it goes how the schedule paired with our 27th ranked O predictably most likely goes.  Everyone out the door together.  Bryce is a bridge tier QB.  I don’t see Dave surviving where he could be bridge QB here in reality. 
    • I think the D performed well over the season considering it was put together with Scotch tape. 
×
×
  • Create New...